Detailed Information

Cited 42 time in webofscience Cited 45 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Theta Oscillation Related to the Auditory Discrimination Process in Mismatch Negativity: Oddball versus Control Paradigm

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKo, Deokwon-
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Soyoung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Gwan-Taek-
dc.contributor.authorIm, Chang Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyung Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Ki-Young-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T19:30:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-02T19:30:02Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-
dc.identifier.issn1738-6586-
dc.identifier.issn2005-5013-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/27580-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose The aim of this study was to identify the mechanism underlying the auditory discriminatory process reflected in mismatch negativity (MMN), using time-frequency analysis of single-trial event-related potentials (ERPs). Methods Two auditory tones of different probabilities (oddball paradigm) and the same probability (control paradigm) were used. The average dynamic changes in amplitude were evaluated, and the in-phase consistency of the EEG spectrum at each frequency and time window across trials, event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), and inter-trial phase coherence (ITC) were computed. Results Subtraction of the ERPs of standard stimuli from the ERPs of deviant stimuli revealed a clear MMN component in the oddball paradigm. However, no discernible MMN component was observed in the control paradigm. Statistical tests showed that in the oddball paradigm, deviant tones produced significant increases of theta ERSPs and ITC at around 250 ms as compared with the standard tone, while no significant difference between the two stimuli was observed in the control paradigm. Conclusions Our results confirm that the auditory discriminatory process reflected in MMN is accompanied by phase resetting and power modulation at the theta frequency. J Clin Neurol 2012;8:35-42-
dc.format.extent8-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisher대한신경과학회-
dc.titleTheta Oscillation Related to the Auditory Discrimination Process in Mismatch Negativity: Oddball versus Control Paradigm-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.3988/jcn.2012.8.1.35-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84930480824-
dc.identifier.wosid000302445200004-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Clinical Neurology, v.8, no.1, pp 35 - 42-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Clinical Neurology-
dc.citation.volume8-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage35-
dc.citation.endPage42-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART001646900-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaNeurosciences & Neurology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryClinical Neurology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRIAL EEG DYNAMICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTEMPORAL-LOBE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHASE RESET-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMEMORY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCORTEX-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALPHA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusERPS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMMN-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorevent-related potential-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormismatch negativity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorauditory discrimination-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorevent-related spectral perturbations-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorinter-trial phase coherence-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.thejcn.com/DOIx.php?id=10.3988/jcn.2012.8.1.35-
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 공과대학 > ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Im, Chang Hwan photo

Im, Chang Hwan
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (서울 바이오메디컬공학전공)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE