Forward-viewing endoscope for ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, T.Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bang, C.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, S.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Y.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, S.P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Suk, K.T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Baik, G.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, D.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, Jai Hoon | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-30T05:09:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-30T05:09:56Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0930-2794 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/3303 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background The forward-viewing endoscope has been increasingly used to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients who underwent Billroth II gastrectomy. This study intended to assess efficacy and safety of the forward-viewing endoscope for ERCP in Billroth II gastrectomy patients compared with conventional side-viewing endoscope using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic review was conducted for studies that evaluated the outcomes of ERCP for patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Random-effect model meta-analyses with subgroup analyses were conducted. The methodological quality of the included publications was evaluated using the risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies. The publication bias was assessed. Results In total, 25 studies (1 randomized, 18 retrospective, 1 prospective, and 5 case series studies) with 2446 patients (499 forward-viewing and 1947 side-viewing endoscopes) were analyzed. The pooled afferent loop intubation rate was higher with the forward-viewing endoscope (90.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 85.6–93.6 vs. 86.8%, 95% CI 82.8–89.9%). The pooled selective cannulation rate was higher with the side-viewing endoscope (92.3%, 95% CI 88.0–95.2 vs. 91.1%, 95% CI 87.2–93.9%). The pooled bowel perforation rate was higher with the side-viewing endoscope (3.6%, 95% CI 2.3–5.7 vs. 3.0%, 95% CI 1.7–5.3%). The pooled pancreatitis rate was higher with the forward-viewing endoscope (5.4%, 95% CI 3.6–8.0 vs. 2.5%, 95% CI 2.3–5.7%). The pooled bleeding rate was higher with the forward-viewing endoscope (3.0%, 95% CI 1.6–5.5 vs. 2.0%, 95% CI 1.4–3.0%). The heterogeneity among the studies was not significant. The publication bias was minimal. Conclusion This meta-analysis indicates that the forward-viewing endoscope is as safe and effective as conventional side-viewing endoscope for ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | - |
dc.title | Forward-viewing endoscope for ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Yoon, Jai Hoon | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00464-018-6213-1 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85047138326 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000447953200029 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, v.32, no.11, pp.4598 - 4613 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | - |
dc.citation.title | SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | - |
dc.citation.volume | 32 | - |
dc.citation.number | 11 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 4598 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 4613 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | 정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함)) | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | BILE-DUCT STONES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ALTERED GASTROINTESTINAL ANATOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SINGLE-BALLOON ENTEROSCOPE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EN-Y GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ASSISTED ERCP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PANCREATICOBILIARY ENDOSCOPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | THERAPEUTIC ERCP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PUBLICATION BIAS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SPHINCTEROTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Billroth II operation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Endoscopes | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Duodenoscopes | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Meta-analysis | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-018-6213-1 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.