Cited 0 time in
Malapropisms, Speaker Meaning, and Davidson`s Thoeries of Literal Meaning
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | John M. McGuire | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-04T04:38:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-04T04:38:29Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2005-05-30 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/72413 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper I describe the conflicting theories of literal meaning that can be found in Donald Davidson`s philosophy of language. I also consider the reasons that led Davidson, in his later writings, to embrace an intentions-based theory of literal meaning and I argue that these reasons were ulitmately misguided. Therefore, I conclude that Davidson should not have abandoned his original conventional view of literal meaning. | - |
| dc.title | Malapropisms, Speaker Meaning, and Davidson`s Thoeries of Literal Meaning | - |
| dc.type | Conference | - |
| dc.citation.conferenceName | 49th Congress of Humanities and Social Sciences | - |
| dc.citation.conferencePlace | University of Western Ontario | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1366
COPYRIGHT © 2024 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
