ScholarWorks@Hanyang University: Koo, Ja Hoon

Detailed Information

Koo, Ja Hoon (구자훈)

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF URBAN STUDIES (DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT)

Research Area

Tel 02-2220-0339
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

도시재생:5||Urban Regeneration:5||Residential Environment Improving Project:5||주거지 재생사업:4||사회적 자본:3||PLS 회귀분석:3||Social capital:3||ANP:3||DEMATEL:3||고령 거주자의 만족도:3||Urban Design:3||biotop area ratio:2||상관관계 분석:2||Mixeduse housing:2||Commercial Facility Cluster Type:2||Design Guideline:2||Multiple Regression Analysis:2||Artist:2||다중회귀분석:2||담장허물기:2||대인예술시장:2||District Unit Planning:2||세운상가군 일대 도시재생사업:2||Korea Housing Survey:2||중요도만족도 분석:2||지구단위계획:2||수도권:2||Price determinant:2||ecological planning indicators:2||Elderly Residental Satisfaction:2||Housing price gap:2||Newtown Subway Station Area:2||Purchasing and Service Usage Behavior:2||QGIS:2||Nightscape Planning:2||Housing price inequality:2||예술인:2||Social Activity:2||ImportancePerformance Analysis:2||plottage:2||평가지표:2||Urban Regeneration Project:2||Social Capital:2||Social Interaction:2||육아환경:2||Social Mix:2||Concentration of the Vulnerable Groups:2||Social Network Analysis:2||혼합단지:2||공동체주택:2||CHAID(CHisquared Automatic Interaction Detection):2||social capital:2||PLS Regression Analysis:2||Gini coefficient:2||사회적 교류:2||사회적 혼합:2||사회적 활동:2||Green Parking:2||apartment housing:2||Metropolitan area:2||Community Housing:2||Mixeduse Development:2||Elderly Residential Satisfaction:1||Elderly Residents:1||Engraved Stone Buddhist:1||Evaluation Criteria:1||Evaluation Indicators:1||Evaluation System:1||Evaluation item for Industrial Support:1||Evaluation item for Urban Regeneration:1||External Cognition:1||Factor analysis:1||Feasibility on Business:1||Garosu street:1||Gentrification:1||Gyeongju:1||Hanok Area:1||Health Perception:1||Hierarchical Linear Model:1||High Dense Singledetached Housing Area:1||Housing Choice:1||Housing Regeneration:1||Importance Analysis:1||Improvement of Policy:1||Induced Tenant Companies:1||Inflow rate of commuting:1||Influence Factor:1||Innovation:1||Innovation City:1||Intention to Continue Art Activity:1||Internal⋅External User:1||Jangwi Urban Regeneration Zone:1||Land Use Change:1||Landscape Cognition:1||Local Activities:1||Locational Pattern:1||Logistic Regression Model:1||Longitudinal luminance uniformity:1||Low Fertility:1||Low Story &:1||Market Competitiveness:1||Mental health:1||Mixed Housing Block:1||Mt. Namsan:1||Multilevel logit model:1||Neighborhood environment characteristics:1||NetMiner Suncheon City:1||Network Characteristic:1||New CBD of Northeastern Seoul:1||New Urbanism:1||NewTown Project:1||NonPhysical Elements:1||Optional⋅Social Activities:1||Outdoor Advertising:1||Overall luminance uniformity:1||Owner:1||PLS regression analysis:1||PLSSEM:1||PLSregression Analysis:1||PLS구조방정식:1||PLS회귀분석:1||Participant:1||Participation Intention in Neighborhood Community:1||Physical:1||Physical Characteristic of Public Open Space:1||Physical Environment for Childrearing:1||Policy Evaluation System:1||PortfolioAnalysis:1||Profitability:1||Public Design:1||Public Rental Housing:1||PublicPurchased Rental Housing:1||Quality of Service:1||Real Estate Development:1||Regional inequality:1||Regression Analysis:1||Regulation In Visitorsʼ Behaviors:1||Rental Multifamily housing:1||Resident Activity:1||Residential Environment:1||Residential Satisfaction:1||Residents of Private Rental Housing:1||Resident’s Participation:1||Resource Recovery Facility:1||Road lighting:1||Rock Worship:1||Routine Activities:1||SME:1||SamcheongdongGil:1||Sanggye:1||Scatter Diagram:1||Sense of Neighborhood Community:1||Sense of Place:1||Seoul Metropolitan Area:1||Seoul Survey:1||Seoul Youth Space:1||Sewoon Plaza Urban Regeneration:1||Sewoon plaza urban regeneration:1||Shared Housing:1||Single:1||Singleperson household:1||Smart City:1||Social Activity Setting:1||Social Mix Housing Complex:1||Social interaction:1||South korea:1||Spatial Autocorrelation:1||Spatial Polarization:1||Spatial analysis:1||Special Law for Urban Improvement Promotions:1||Special Planning District:1||Spontaneous Tenant Companies:1||Street Characteristic:1||Street View:1||Structural Equation Modeling:1||Subway:1||Suicidal impulse:1||Survey and Interview:1||Sustainability:1||Sustainable Activity Intention of Artists:1||Synapse:1||Territoriality:1||Text Network Analysis:1||Threshold Increment:1||Total Fertility Rate:1||Totatoga:1||Traditional market:1||Transaction Form:1||Type of Street Characteristics:1||Types of Social Activities:1||Urban Industry Concentrated Area:1||Urban Redevelopment District:1||Urban Regeneration Project of Suncheon City:1||Urban form characteristics:1||Urban functionality:1||Urban regeneration:1||User&apos:1||ValueforMoney:1||Walkable Distance:1||Walking activities by purpose:1||Walking activities of the elderly:1||Young Adult Household:1||Youth Population:1||analytic hierarchy process(AHP):1||appraised value of land:1||assets:1||base facility:1||childrearing environment:1||collaborative governance:1||community engagement:1||community space:1||conservation:1||cultural promotion activities:1||cultureled regeneration:1||developmental profits:1||economic inequality:1||ecosystem:1||evaluation index:1||green technology:1||historiccultural conservation:1||historical city:1||hukou:1||indirect Influence Area:1||industrial model:1||industrial supporting policy:1||network:1||new tenant companies:1||perception:1||preservation:1||regeneration:1||regeneration of urban industry concentrated area:1||rehabilitation:1||routine activities:1||s Behavior:1||s Participation:1||social interaction:1||socioeconomic status:1||spatial autocorrelation:1||spatial regression:1||stakeholders&:1||sustainability:1||sustainable community:1||tenure choice:1||the Community Activity:1||urban development plan:1||urban regeneration:1||urban regeneration in the Nanluoguxiang:1||urban regeneration supporting policy:1||viability:1||virtual organization:1||가격결정:1||가로수길:1||가로특성:1||가로특성유형:1||가중치 분석:1||간접영향권:1||개발이익:1||거래관계:1||거리뷰:1||거점시설:1||거주만족도:1||거주환경:1||건강인식:1||계획지침:1||고령 거주자:1||공간자기상관:1||공간자기상관분석:1||공간적 양극화:1||공간통계분석:1||공간회귀모형:1||공개공지의 물리적 특성:1||공공 매입임대주택:1||공공디자인:1||공공임대주택:1||공동주택:1||공동주택단지:1||공시지가:1||공유주택:1||구매 및 서비스이용행태:1||구조방정식모형:1||균형성과관리시스템:1||근린공동체 의식:1||근린공동체 참여의사:1||근린환경특성:1||근린활동:1||내⋅외부 이용자:1||네크워크 분석적 의사결정방법:1||네크워크분석적 의사결정법(ANP):1||노인의 보행활동:1||노후저층 주거지역:1||노후주거지:1||뉴어바니즘:1||뉴타운사업:1||대지면적:1||도시기능:1||도시디자인:1||도시및주거환경정비법:1||도시브랜드:1||도시설계:1||도시재생 지원정책:1||도시재생 평가항목:1||도시재정비촉진법:1||도시정체성:1||도시특성:1||도시환경정비구역:1||도심산업 집적지:1||도심산업 집적지 재생:1||디자인서울거리:1||디지털 사회혁신:1||또따또가:1||로지스틱회귀분석:1||목적별 보행활동:1||문화지원활동:1||물리적 요소:1||민간임대주택 거주자:1||보행가능거리:1||복합용도개발:1||부동산개발사업:1||북촌:1||북촌한옥마을:1||분석적 계층화 과정:1||분양임대주택 차이:1||비 물리적 요소:1||사업실현성:1||사회 관계망 분석:1||사회적 활동 유형:1||사회적 활동상황:1||사회적관계망 특성:1||산업지원 정책:1||산업지원 평가항목:1||산점도:1||삼청동길:1||상업가로:1||상업시설입지유형:1||생태면적률:1||생활가로:1||생활교통형 자전거도로:1||서비스 질:1||서울서베이:1||선택적⋅사회적 활동:1||세부개발계획:1||소셜네트워크 분석:1||순천시 원도심 도시재생사업:1||쉐어하우스:1||스마트도시:1||시냅스:1||시민참여:1||시장경쟁력:1||시장분석:1||신규입주업체:1||신도시 지하철역세권:1||야간경관계획:1||역세권:1||역세권 다가구주택:1||영역성:1||영향요인:1||예술인의 지속적 활동 의사:1||옥외광고물:1||외부유입통근율:1||외부적 인지:1||요인분석:1||위계선형모형:1||유도형 입주업체:1||의사결정나무법(CART):1||의사결정나무분석:1||의사결정나무분석(CRT):1||이용자 행위 유형:1||이용행태:1||이중차분법:1||이항로짓모형:1||이항로짓분석:1||이항로짓회귀분석:1||인과관계분석:1||인지유형:1||인지차이:1||일상적 활동:1||입지유형:1||자발적 입주업체:1||자원회수시설:1||장소성:1||장위 도시재생 활성화구역:1||저출산:1||저층고밀 단독주거지:1||전통시장:1||정책평가체계:1||제도개선:1||젠트리피케이션:1||주거 선택:1||주거선택모형:1||주거실태조사:1||주거재생:1||주거지 정비사업:1||주민 참여:1||주민 활동:1||주상복합아파트:1||중심시가지형:1||지니계수:1||지속적 활동의사:1||지역 불평등:1||지역균형발전:1||지역활동:1||지하철:1||진단 항목:1||참여주체의 변화:1||창작공간:1||청년인구:1||취약계층 거주밀집지역:1||취약계층 밀집:1||코리빙:1||토지 등 소유자:1||토지이용변화:1||통근거리:1||통근패턴:1||투자가치평가:1||특별계획구역:1||평가 항목:1||평가체계:1||포트폴리오분석:1||한옥밀집지역:1||합계출산율:1||행위규제:1||혁신:1||혁신도시:1||협력네트워크 특성:1||환경계획지표:1||#8217:1||회귀분석:1||1인 청년가구:1||1인가구:1||AHP analysis:1||AHP 분석:1||Analysis of the Weights:1||Analytic Network Process(ANP):1||Apartment Housing:1||Artist Network:1||Average maintained luminance:1||BSC system:1||Balanced Regional Development:1||Behaviors Pattern:1||Binary Logit Model:1||Binary Logit analysis:1||Binary regression Analysis:1||Bukchon:1||Bukchon Hanok Village:1||CHAID:1||CHAID(Chisquared Automatic Interaction Detection):1||Catchment Area:1||Categorical Analysis and Regression Tree (CART):1||Causal Relationship Analysis:1||Causes of artist outflow:1||Central District type:1||Changdong:1||Change of Participants:1||China inequality:1||Citizen&apos:1||City Brand:1||City Identity:1||CityBrand:1||CityIdentity:1||CoLiving:1||CognitionType:1||Cognitive Characteristics:1||Cognitive Differences:1||Commercial road:1||Communication Theory:1||Community Bicycle Road:1||CommunityStreet:1||Commute distance:1||Commute pattern:1||Coordination Network Characteristics:1||Correlation Analysis:1||Correlation Keywords : Analysis:1||Creative Space:1||Culture Support Activities:1||Daein Art Maket:1||Daein Art Market:1||Daily mental stress:1||Decision Tree Analysis (CRT):1||Design Seoul Street:1||Detailed Development Unit Plan:1||Deteriorated Lowrise Residental Area:1||Deteriorated Residence:1||Diagnosis items:1||Difference between The Rental and The Sales Housing:1||DifferenceinDifference:1||Digital Social Innovation:1||District Unit Plan:1||Economic inequality:1||

STATISTICS: Total View :4,982,575; Today View :3,595

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE