A holistic approach to individual-level innovation implementation
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이용진 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pak, Jongwook | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Goo Hyeok | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-10T02:43:11Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-07-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1447-9338 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/1416 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Innovation and information systems scholars have extensively studied the individual-level innovation implementation process, drawing on the theories of technology acceptance (e.g., TAM2). However, based on the less-balanced theoretical underpinnings, they have constituted antecedents of implementation: some included either individual or organisational factors; others merely viewed individual characteristics as contingencies while emphasising organisational factors as predictors. In this study, we present a more balanced view, by considering dispositional, experiential and organisational readiness to innovation implementation as three antecedents that predict components of the TAM2 (i.e., perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and subjective norm). Conceptualising three antecedents as personal innovativeness, innovation self-efficacy and facilitating climate, respectively, we examine the relationships between readiness factors and the TAM2, subsequently influencing innovation implementation and its outcomes. Our results confirmed that personal innovativeness and facilitating climate were positively related to perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and subjective norm but that innovation self-efficacy was positively associated with only the first two factors. Among the three antecedents in our sample, facilitating climate most strongly predicted the three components of the TAM2. Furthermore, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use predicted intention to use, which in turn led to implementation behaviour and extended innovation effectiveness. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS | - |
dc.title | A holistic approach to individual-level innovation implementation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이용진 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14479338.2019.1632710 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85068060795 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000475178100001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, v.21, no.4, pp.552 - 571 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.citation.title | INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.citation.volume | 21 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 552 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 571 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | extended innovation effectiveness | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | facilitating climate | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Innovation implementation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | innovation self-efficacy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | personal innovativeness | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | technology acceptance | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
94, Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04066, Korea02-320-1314
COPYRIGHT 2020 HONGIK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.