The Ambilaterality of Fluency in Translating Literature in Peripheral Contexts
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 윤후남 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-25T03:41:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-25T03:41:55Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-11-23 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-795X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/18311 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Translation history shows that linguistic ethnocentrism and cultural hegemony have influenced translating from antiquity to today. One of the prominent results of such influence is fluency in translating literature. As Venuti points out, in British, American and European contexts, fluency in translating foreign texts has prevailed over other translation strategies, constituting a melting pot where heterogeneous elements are melted together into harmonious ones which are acceptable to dominant cultures. In the process, the differences and the identity of other cultures are erased or reduced so as to be almost invisible. As an ethical strategy against such violence on the source culture, literalism or foreignization has been proposed among Western scholars. In peripheral contexts, however, literalism may not be an ethical strategy but instead may actually inflict violence on the source culture. When translating from a minority-status language culture to a dominant culture, for example, it may produce potentially unreadable texts, increasing the risk of readers being excluded, and thereby confining texts within the national border by closing off the possibilities of texts being circulated throughout the world. These peripheral contexts have rarely been discussed in translation studies. What does fluency strategy mean in peripheral contexts in the case of translating from a minority-status language culture to a dominant target language? What would be the influence of this strategy on the source culture beyond national borders? This paper aims to investigate these questions using the example of the Korean novel Please Look after Mom, a million-copy seller in South Korea, which was translated into English in 2009 and won popularity among English-speaking readers. It argues that fluency strategy constitutes a strategic progressive invasion into a dominant culture in peripheral contexts. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 한국번역학회 | - |
dc.title | The Ambilaterality of Fluency in Translating Literature in Peripheral Contexts | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Ambilaterality of Fluency in Translating Literature in Peripheral Contexts | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 윤후남 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15749/jts.2014.15.4.009 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 번역학연구, v.15, no.4, pp.287 - 321 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 번역학연구 | - |
dc.citation.title | 번역학연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 15 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 287 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 321 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001921165 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Fluency strategy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Foreignization | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Ethical strategy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Minority-status language culture | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Mimicry | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Hybrid text | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Stubborn chunks | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
94, Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04066, Korea02-320-1314
COPYRIGHT 2020 HONGIK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.