Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

재현의 기호학적 이해와 형상적 미술론

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author신항식-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T04:42:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-17T04:42:13Z-
dc.date.created2022-02-17-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.issn1229-0246-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/25326-
dc.description.abstractThe actual critical questions of representation are associated with the crisis of political power of the American logical positivists. Their philosophy became weakened in every social sphere and developed by themselves its critical post modern trends without notice. The reason is very simple; their demoniac and imprudent vision of the world. Their main purpose of researching the social facts is not to show a probable or real relationship of the method to these facts, but is to pursue their own profits and desires to the world society. This contradiction between the representational logic and their anti-representational, that is to say, auto generative behaviors comes down to develop some self-deceiving visions in everyday life and in scientific area. Informal opinions dominate naturally formal ones in the governmental and economical Administration, Universities etc. As a pretext, formal opinion pass softly by. * Adjunct Professor, Visual Communication Design Dep. of Hongik University The contemporary arts are the results of self-deceiving visions of the American logical positivists. The former accepted the reality-represented that the latter displaced as a fraud, whereas refused real realities to have to represent. This is the reason why comtemporary arts have their own auto generative rules exactly as is in the American logical positivists. To refuse and to fake the reality are a same attitude and divide equally same desire; to possess the world in their pocket. The crisis of representation is not a crisis of the world or of the Man but the one of the American logical positivists’ mind. And I give the same conclusion for the American contemporary arts as I described in a similar manner for this one. Some defiant acts are necessary today for the purpose of overcoming this auto generative logic of representation shared by American scientific attitude as well as their contemporary arts trends.-
dc.publisher한국미학예술학회-
dc.title재현의 기호학적 이해와 형상적 미술론-
dc.title.alternativeA Semiotic Approach to the Problem of Representation and the Figurativist View on the Art-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor신항식-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation미학예술학연구, v.22, pp.157 - 190-
dc.relation.isPartOf미학예술학연구-
dc.citation.title미학예술학연구-
dc.citation.volume22-
dc.citation.startPage157-
dc.citation.endPage190-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART000982885-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorrepresentational mode-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoriconical mode-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorindexical mode-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsymbolic mode-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorscience and arts-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpositivism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsocial science-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorutilitarianism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorauto-generation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcommunication-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor도상적 재현방식-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor지표적 재현방식-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor상징적 재현방식-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor과학과 예술-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor실증 사회과학-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor공리주의-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor자동생성-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor커뮤니케이션-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE