Analysis on determining the allocation ratio of transmission service costs using the arbitration game
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chung, K.-H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoo, C.-I. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, D.-J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, B.H. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-14T09:43:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-14T09:43:30Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-03-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1474-6670 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/26613 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In many parts of the world, the electricity industry is undergoing unprecedented changes. Hence, in order to restructure the electricity industry readily and efficiently and minimize the confusion related to restructuring, it is required the systematic studies on transmission pricing and the allocation of transmission service costs between generators and distributors. However, the allocation ratio of transmission service costs have been determined by regulator arbitrarily under the common practice since there is not any criterion with respect to allocating transmission service costs even now. This paper demonstrates that detemrining the allocation ratio of transmission service costs between generators and distributors is regulator's own authority using game theory. For the analysis, the competition for generators and distributors to determine own allocation ratio is modeled as the arbitration game. © 2003 IFAC. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | IFAC Secretariat | - |
dc.title | Analysis on determining the allocation ratio of transmission service costs using the arbitration game | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, B.H. | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S14746670(17)34611-6 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85064459697 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), v.36, no.20, pp.1037 - 1040 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline) | - |
dc.citation.title | IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline) | - |
dc.citation.volume | 36 | - |
dc.citation.number | 20 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1037 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1040 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Conference Paper | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Allocation ratio | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Final-offer arbitration | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Game theory | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nash equilibrium | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Transmission service cost | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
94, Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04066, Korea02-320-1314
COPYRIGHT 2020 HONGIK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.