PBP(Price Based Pool) 발전경쟁시장에서의 최적입찰전략수립
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 강동주 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 허진 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 문영환 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 정구형 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김발호 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-11T02:44:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-11T02:44:07Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-04-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-2443 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/26927 | - |
dc.description.abstract | - The restructuring of power industry is still going on all over the world for last several decades. Many kinds of restructuring model have been studied, proposed, and applied. Among those models, power pool is more popular than others. This paper assumes the power pool market structure having competitive generation sector, and a new method is presented to build a bidding strategy in that market. The utilities participating in the market have the perfect information of their cost and price functions, but they don't know which strategy to be chosen by others. To define one's strategy as a vector, we make utility's cost/price functions into discrete step functions. An utility knows only his own strategy, so he estimates the other's strategy using Nash equilibrium or stochastic methods. And he also has to forecast the system demand. According to this forecasting result, his payoffs can be changed. Considering these all conditions, we formulate a bidding game problem and apply noncooperative game theory to that problem for the optimal strategy or solution. Some restrictive assumptions are added for simplification of solving process. A numerical example is given in Case Study to show essential features and concrete results of this approach. | - |
dc.publisher | 대한전기학회 | - |
dc.title | PBP(Price Based Pool) 발전경쟁시장에서의 최적입찰전략수립 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김발호 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 전기학회논문지 A권, v.51, no.12, pp.597 - 602 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 전기학회논문지 A권 | - |
dc.citation.title | 전기학회논문지 A권 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 51 | - |
dc.citation.number | 12 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 597 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 602 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART000905793 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | bidding game | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | optimal strategy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | PBP market | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cost/price function | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nash equilibrium | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | bidding game | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | optimal strategy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | PBP market | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cost/price function | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nash equilibrium | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
94, Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04066, Korea02-320-1314
COPYRIGHT 2020 HONGIK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.