A method for modularity in design rules for additive manufacturing
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jee, Haeseong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Witherell, Paul | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-10T05:40:50Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-07-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1355-2546 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/6899 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose - As the technology matures, design rules for additive manufacturing (AM) can help ensure manufacturability, which can be viewed as compatibility between designs and the fabrication processes that produce those designs. Though often informal, current rules frequently provide direct guidelines or constraints for designing AM-destined parts. The aim of this paper is to standardize how design rules are developed and conveyed in AM by presenting design rules as sets of modular components and associated formalisms. Design/methodology/approach - The proposed methodology decomposes fundamental geometry, process and material relationships into reusable modules. Independent of context, modular representations can be more easily interpreted and efficiently implemented than current one. By providing task-specific context, components are specialized to represent process-specific parameters for different AM builds and processes. This method of specialization enables designers to reconfigure design rules, rather than create new rules from scratch, thus preserving fundamental AM principles while supporting customization and explicit representation. Findings - Modularity and formalisms provide both structure for the generalizations and a means to tailor that structure for a specific process, machine or build. The adoption of principles and formalisms that allow us to modify, extend, reconfigure or customize generalized rules as needed - instinctively and deliberately. Originality/value - This method of specialization enables designers to reconfigure design rules, rather than create new rules from scratch, thus preserving fundamental AM principles while supporting customization and explicit representation. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD | - |
dc.title | A method for modularity in design rules for additive manufacturing | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Jee, Haeseong | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/RPJ-02-2016-0016 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85036463433 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000416572700015 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, v.23, no.6, pp.1107 - 1118 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL | - |
dc.citation.title | RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL | - |
dc.citation.volume | 23 | - |
dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1107 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1118 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Materials Science | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Mechanical | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Materials Science, Multidisciplinary | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Additive manufacturing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Modularity | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Design constraints | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Design rules | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
94, Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04066, Korea02-320-1314
COPYRIGHT 2020 HONGIK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.