Does organizational innovation moderate technical innovation directly or indirectly?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cozzarin, Brian Paul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Weonseek | - |
dc.contributor.author | Koo, Bonwoo | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-10T05:41:02Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-07-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1043-8599 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/6918 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We find a divergence in the literature regarding the treatment of how organizational innovation affects innovation and performance. One point of view suggests that organizational innovation impacts performance only, while the other suggests that it impacts technical innovation and firm performance. We use the framework of Crepon-Duguet-Mairesse (CDM) to control for endogeneity; we also use two different measures for organizational innovation. Our contributions to the literature are: the CDM framework in this context is novel; prior research either did not/could not control for endogeneity whereas the CDM framework mitigates this. To discriminate between the direct and indirect approach, we implemented AIC and BIC tests. We find that for the innovation equations in all cases and regardless of which organizational innovation variable is used the direct model is preferable. In contrast, for the productivity equations, we find that in all cases the indirect model is preferable. Thus we do not have a definitive statistical test for which model is superior. Yet, it is our contention that organizational innovation is a new routine within the firm that should impact technical innovation. Furthermore, organizational design theories deduce that organizational innovation should impact technical innovation-implying that the direct model is indeed preferable. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | - |
dc.subject | RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT | - |
dc.subject | PRODUCTIVITY | - |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCE | - |
dc.subject | IMPACT | - |
dc.subject | SMES | - |
dc.title | Does organizational innovation moderate technical innovation directly or indirectly? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Weonseek | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10438599.2016.1203084 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84981714749 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000410584200006 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, v.26, no.4, pp.385 - 403 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 26 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 385 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 403 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Economics | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PRODUCTIVITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PERFORMANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | IMPACT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SMES | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Organizational innovation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | direct or indirect effect on product/process innovation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | CDM model | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | government policy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | South Korea | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
94, Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04066, Korea02-320-1314
COPYRIGHT 2020 HONGIK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.