Assessment of the Adequacy of Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Study Using a Monte Carlo Simulation
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ha, Chunghun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, David S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, SeJoon | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-10T05:41:20Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-07-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1024-123X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/6958 | - |
dc.description.abstract | ANOVA gauge repeatability and reproducibility study is the most popular tool for measurement system analysis. Two experimental designs can be applied depending on the durability of the objects. If repeated measurements are possible or sufficient homogeneous nonrepeatable samples are available, crossed design is appropriate; otherwise, nested design should be used. In this paper, we investigated the adequacy of ANOVA gauge repeatability and reproducibility study from the perspective of practitioners. We proposed a Monte Carlo simulation that is close to the realistic procedure to evaluate the adequacy of both structures. During the evaluation, we considered the average performance metrics, percentage of correct decision, histogram shape, and symmetric mean absolute percentage error for the four popular performance metrics, namely,% Study Variation,% Contribution,% Tolerance, and the number of distinct categories. The experimental results show that the nested design fails to judge the precision of the gauge while the crossed design succeeds. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | HINDAWI LTD | - |
dc.subject | R-AND-R | - |
dc.subject | CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS | - |
dc.subject | VARIANCE-COMPONENTS | - |
dc.title | Assessment of the Adequacy of Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Study Using a Monte Carlo Simulation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Ha, Chunghun | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1155/2017/7237486 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85028603856 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000408208800001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, v.2017 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING | - |
dc.citation.title | MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING | - |
dc.citation.volume | 2017 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Mathematics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Multidisciplinary | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | R-AND-R | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | VARIANCE-COMPONENTS | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
94, Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04066, Korea02-320-1314
COPYRIGHT 2020 HONGIK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.