The Interplay of Top-down Institutional Pressures and Bottom-up Responses of Transition Economy Firms on FDI Entry Mode Choices
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Chris Changwha | - |
dc.contributor.author | Xiao, Simon Shufeng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jeoung Yul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Jingoo | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-10T05:49:08Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-07-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0938-8249 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/7350 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines the role of institutions in explaining the FDI entry mode choices of transition economy firms. Advancing an institution-based view of international business strategy, the paper proposes a model of interactive institutional processes that incorporates both top-down institutional pressures and the bottom-up heterogeneous responses of individual firms to such pressures. The findings are based on a sample of 594 outward FDI entries made by Chinese firms. The results indicate that institutional pressures exerted by the home country government have a significant effect on outward FDI ownership decisions, such that firms facing greater institutional pressures are more inclined to choose outward international joint ventures (OIJVs) over wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. However, the effect of institutional government pressures on FDI entry mode choices is weaker for firms which are less dependent on the Chinese government for resources and thus enjoy more institutional freedom. Specifically, the ownership structures of Chinese firms moderate the positive effect of home country government pressures on the choice of OIJVs, such that the positive effect is weaker for modernized firms (i.e., newly created private and reformed incorporated firms) than conventional firms (i.e., state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and collectives). The positive effect is weaker for collectives than SOEs, while the positive effect is weaker for private firms than reformed firms (i.e., private firms < reformed firms < collectives < SOEs). | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER HEIDELBERG | - |
dc.subject | TRANSACTION COST INFLUENCES | - |
dc.subject | MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISES | - |
dc.subject | OWNERSHIP STRATEGIES | - |
dc.subject | EMERGING MARKET | - |
dc.subject | DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES | - |
dc.subject | PARTNER SELECTION | - |
dc.subject | JOINT VENTURES | - |
dc.subject | CHINESE FIRMS | - |
dc.subject | OUTWARD FDI | - |
dc.subject | FOREIGN | - |
dc.title | The Interplay of Top-down Institutional Pressures and Bottom-up Responses of Transition Economy Firms on FDI Entry Mode Choices | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Jeoung Yul | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11575-015-0256-5 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84944707523 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000383499000004 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, v.56, no.5, pp.699 - 732 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW | - |
dc.citation.title | MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW | - |
dc.citation.volume | 56 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 699 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 732 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Management | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRANSACTION COST INFLUENCES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OWNERSHIP STRATEGIES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EMERGING MARKET | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PARTNER SELECTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | JOINT VENTURES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CHINESE FIRMS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OUTWARD FDI | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FOREIGN | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Institutional pressures | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Institutional freedom | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Foreign direct investment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Outward international joint ventures | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Transition economies | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | China | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
94, Wausan-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04066, Korea02-320-1314
COPYRIGHT 2020 HONGIK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.