Comparison of Two Acidic Leaching Processes for Selecting the Effective Recycle Process of Spent Lithium ion Battery
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 손정수 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김수경 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이철경 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shun-Myung Shin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dong-Hyo Yang | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-11T11:30:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-11T11:30:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-9328 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2166-3394 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/kumoh/handle/2020.sw.kumoh/22810 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Physical treatment and chemical treatment of spent lithium-ion battery were studied in our research team. Especially we developed two types of acidic leaching for crushed powders containing LiCoO2 of spent lithium ion battery. One of them is sulfuric acid leaching with H2O2 as a reducing agent. The leaching rates of cobalt, lithium and the other metals were above 99 % at the condition of 2 M H2SO4, 10 vol. % H2O2, 75oC, 300 rpm agitation speed, 250 g/5L solid liquid ratio and 75 minutes reaction time. And the other leaching process is the oxalic acid leaching. In this process more than 99% of Li and less than 1% of Co were dissolved at the condition of 3M oxalic acid, 80oC reaction temperature, 300rpm agitation speed, 50g/L initial solid/liquid ratio and 90min extraction time. Each process has its advantage and disadvantage. In sulfuric acid leaching, leaching reagent is very cheap and cobalt could be recovered into cobalt hydroxide. On the other hand, oxalic acid is more expensive than sulfuric acid but lithium could be dissolved selectively. Also cobalt could be recovered into cobalt oxalate and it could be changed into cobalt oxide after heat treatment. In order to select the effective recycling process, recovery rate and purity of cobalt hydroxide and cobalt oxalate were compared and it was investigated which process was more environment- friendly and economical. | - |
dc.format.extent | 6 | - |
dc.publisher | 한국자원공학회 | - |
dc.title | Comparison of Two Acidic Leaching Processes for Selecting the Effective Recycle Process of Spent Lithium ion Battery | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Geosystem Engineering, v.9, no.1, pp 1 - 6 | - |
dc.citation.title | Geosystem Engineering | - |
dc.citation.volume | 9 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001178494 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kciCandi | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | spent lithium ion battery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | sulfuric acid leaching | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | oxalic acid leaching | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cobalt recovery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | spent lithium ion battery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | sulfuric acid leaching | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | oxalic acid leaching | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cobalt recovery | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
350-27, Gumi-daero, Gumi-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea (39253)054-478-7170
COPYRIGHT 2020 Kumoh University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.