전통시대의 신라인식

Abstract

Traditional times' cognition of Silla state appears distinctions with some difference in those days. Historiography produced in Koryeo of 10th-14th century showed to accept Choi chi-yun's cognition that three states succeeded in Three Han and then Silla state succeeded from JinHan and Silla state was a descendant of Dan Gun. Such a cognition heightened a understanding of connecting from times before Silla to Silla state. Historical records showed that Gung Ye and Gyeon Hwon were described as the worst leaders and the King of KyungSun(Kim Bu) was praised by surrendering for Wang Geon and they showed to appraise Silla affirmatively. While spreading of confucianism in the late of Koryeo, Some tended to criticize surrender of King, KyungSun for Wang Geon in the logic of 'not to serving two kings'. Official records produced in earlier Chosun dynasty of 15th-16th century showed that they gave the state of Silla a legitimacy and Silla achieved a unified state with its moral predominancy between three states. Officials records described to praise a convert of King, KyungSun. In the late of King, SungJong, this tendency was heightened to emphasize fidelity. On the other hand, historical records produced by individuals in the 16th century begun to be described differently by each viewpoint about the rising and fall of Silla dynasty. Generally, they were developed to accept cognition of Silla state completed in Chosun dynasty. Their individuals' historical records were described to hold some difference according to strength of state, by birthplace of individuals or by political inclination. People who succeeded in orthodox confucianism in the basis of YoungNam area followed to cognition of earlier Chosun about the state of Silla. NamIn power group from Yongnam area insisted that Silla was developed from JinHan and Silla state succeeded in MaHan as a legitimacy lineage. They seemed to accept the cognition of Silla presented in <<Dongguktonggam>> relating to the fall of Silla. But NamIn peoples of GiHo area didn't follow the position of orthodox lineage. They showed the critical viewpoint of traditional and disordered politic. Some scholars including Lee Jong-Hwi developed to emphasize the viewpoint which succeeded in Kokuryo as a legitimacy lineage. They indicated that the fall of Silla was caused by the deficiency of intense spirit within Silla state. On the other hand, the scholars who engaged to research historical geography had interested in more the growth of state than moral evaluation of Silla state and they focused to explain the phases which the state of Silla amalgamated to several minor states and the territorial expansion of Silla. In the 19th century, some viewpoints got to change by regionalism and some different sects of school observing to the state of Silla. While NamIn people such as Park Ju-Jong in the basis of YoungNam area regarded the predominancy of Silla as the driving force of unification of three states, person such as Yun Jeong-Gi appraised that JinHan and Silla state were weak relatively to another states. There were some historical comments at that times that had focused to criticize more the real political stages or reality of political circumstances than moral evaluation of Silla state. According to above examination, Traditional times' cognition of Silla state showed to appraise that Silla dynasty had achieved the unification of another dynasties owing to harmony and cooperation between king and subjects, respecting for the advanced cultures and fidelity. On the other side, Traditional times' cognition of Silla dynasty showed to indicate that the fall of Silla dynasty was caused by accession of woman king, rebellion of some subjects, warlike policy of Silla, a King's faulty policy and the prevailing over illegal administration and then they showed a limit that they didn't overcome category of success and failure of moralism.