Eco-Innovation for Sustainability: Evidence from 49 Countries in Asia and Europe
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jo, Jang-Hwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Roh, Tae Woo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Seonghoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Youn, Yeo-Chang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Mi Sun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Ki Joo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jang, Eun Kyung | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-11T19:25:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-11T19:25:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2071-1050 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/10096 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Following the trend on focusing on a nation's economic-growth, side effects such as resource exhaustion, environmental pollution, and social injustice have begun to appear. As a solution, eco-innovation has received a great amount of attention from European countries and as a result, many efforts to analyze the development of eco-innovation quantitatively have been made. This study aims to evaluate the validity of an eco-innovation index developed to support the sustainable development goal. For this purpose, four factors of eco-innovationcapacity, supportive environment, activity, and performancewere applied to three categories of the Triple-Bottom-Line (TBL) concept in sustainability to compare the eco-innovation development level of 49 Asia-Europe Meeting countries. Factors for eco-innovation and TBL at the country level were organized in quartile and compared to see strength and weaknesses for each nation. In order to test if eco-innovation factors of a nation adequately reflect its sustainability, we used various comparisons of ANOVA. The results of this study are as follows: First, the one-way ANOVA tests present the scores for capacity, supportive environment, and performance as grouped into four quartiles in the same pattern as their economic, social, and environmental scores. The three-way ANOVA tests showed significance for the economic category. Scores for capacity, supportive environment, activity and performance were significant at a nation's economic level. Lastly, the MANOVA test revealed that TBL significantly explains four eco-innovation factors. In addition, the eco-innovation performance level of European nations and Asian nations were compared. The possibility that many nations still have room to be competitive in their eco-innovation efforts was identified. Nations with unbalanced eco-innovation growth are urged to implement new strategies to balance their growth. Therefore, this research contributes to extending research on eco-innovation. | - |
dc.format.extent | 16 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI Open Access Publishing | - |
dc.title | Eco-Innovation for Sustainability: Evidence from 49 Countries in Asia and Europe | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 스위스 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/su71215849 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84952333231 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000367550900063 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Sustainability, v.7, no.12, pp 16820 - 16835 | - |
dc.citation.title | Sustainability | - |
dc.citation.volume | 7 | - |
dc.citation.number | 12 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 16820 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 16835 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Science & Technology - Other Topics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Green & Sustainable Science & Technology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Studies | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PRODUCT INNOVATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | GREEN INNOVATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | IMPACT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | POLICY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DETERMINANTS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TECHNOLOGY | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | eco-innovation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | sustainability | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Triple-Bottom-Line | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | factors | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.