Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 3 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Accuracy Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Flow Experimental Model

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHeo, Yeong-Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hae-Kag-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Cheol-Soo-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Jae-Hwan-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T20:26:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-11T20:26:53Z-
dc.date.issued2015-03-
dc.identifier.issn1226-1750-
dc.identifier.issn2233-6656-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/10825-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) in terms of reflecting the actual vascular length. Three-dimensional time of flight (3D TOF) MRA, 3D contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA, volume-rendering after CTA and maximum intensity projection were investigated using a flow model phantom with a diameter of 2.11 mm and area of 0.26 cm(2). 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla devices were used for 3D TOF MRA and 3D CE MRA. CTA was investigated using 16 and 64 channel CT scanners, and the images were transmitted and reconstructed by volume-rendering and maximum intensity projection, followed by conduit length measurement as described above. The smallest 3D TOF MRA measure was 2.51 +/- 0.12 mm with a flow velocity of 40 cm/s using the 3.0 Tesla apparatus, and 2.57 +/- 0.07 mm with a velocity of 71.5 cm/s using the 1.5 Tesla apparatus; both images were magnified from the actual measurement of 2.11 mm. The measurement with the 16 channel CT scanner was smaller (3.83 +/- 0.37 mm) than the reconstructed image on maximum intensity projection. The images from CTA from examination apparatus and reconstruction technique were all larger than the actual measurement.-
dc.format.extent7-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisher한국자기학회-
dc.titleAccuracy Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Flow Experimental Model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.4283/JMAG.2015.20.1.040-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84925938603-
dc.identifier.wosid000352116100007-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Magnetics, v.20, no.1, pp 40 - 46-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Magnetics-
dc.citation.volume20-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage40-
dc.citation.endPage46-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART001974464-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMaterials Science-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPhysics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMaterials Science, Multidisciplinary-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPhysics, Applied-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPhysics, Condensed Matter-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFLIGHT MR-ANGIOGRAPHY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCT ANGIOGRAPHY-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormagnetic resonance angiography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcomputed tomography angiography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorflow phantom-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorvascular diameter-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > Department of Computer Science and Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, HAE KAG photo

Lee, HAE KAG
College of Engineering (Department of Computer Science and Engineering)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE