A Randomized Comparison Simulating Face to Face Endotracheal Intubation of Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC Video Laryngoscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Hyun Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Young Min | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Gu Hyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Hyunggoo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jang, Yong Soo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Wonhee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Euichung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Young Soon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Hyukjoong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hyunjong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Gyoung Yong | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-11T21:44:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-11T21:44:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2314-6133 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2314-6141 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/11524 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives. Early airway management is very important for severely ill patients. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of face to face intubation in four different types of laryngoscopes (Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax airway scope (AWS), Glidescope video laryngoscope (GVL), and C-MAC video laryngoscope (C-MAC)). Method. Ninety-five nurses and emergency medical technicians were trained to use the AWS, C-MAC, GVL and Macintosh laryngoscope with standard airway trainer manikin and face to face intubation. We compared VCET (vocal cord exposure time), tube pass time, 1st ventilation time, VCET to tube pass time, tube pass time to 1st ventilation time, and POGO (percentage of glottis opening) score. In addition, we compared success rate according to the number of attempts and complications. Result. VCET was similar among all laryngoscopes and POGO score was higher in AWS. AWS and Macintosh blade were faster than GVL and C-MAC in total intubation time. Face to face intubation success rate was lower in GVL than other laryngoscopes. Conclusion. AWS and Macintosh were favorable laryngoscopes in face to face intubation. GVL had disadvantage performing face to face intubation. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation | - |
dc.title | A Randomized Comparison Simulating Face to Face Endotracheal Intubation of Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC Video Laryngoscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1155/2015/961782 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84934312296 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000357208200001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | BioMed Research International, v.2015 | - |
dc.citation.title | BioMed Research International | - |
dc.citation.volume | 2015 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Research & Experimental Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medicine, Research & Experimental | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRACHEAL INTUBATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Endotracheal Intubation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Pentax Airway Scope | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | emergency | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.