Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 8 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the evidence-based practice questionnaire for nurses

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSon, Youn-Jung-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Youngshin-
dc.contributor.authorPark, So-Youn-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jong-Im-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-12T00:25:19Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-12T00:25:19Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1037-6178-
dc.identifier.issn1839-3535-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/13041-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Measurement of evidence-based practice (EBP) competence is a challenge in the health care setting. Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ). Methods/Design: Data were collected from Korean clinical nurses (N = 801) who worked in acute care settings. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to assess its construct validity. Concurrent validity and internal consistence were also assessed. Results: Findings identified that EFA revealed a three-factor solution with 64.4% of total variance explained. The factor loadings ranged from 0.431 to 0.900 for the 24 items. The instrument showed good reliability and concurrent validity with the Critical Thinking Disposition scale. CFA revealed that the Korean version of the EBPQ was acceptable. Conclusion: The Korean version of the EBPQ is a valid and reliable evaluation measure of EBP competencies of nurses in South Korea.-
dc.format.extent11-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publishereContent Management Pty Ltd-
dc.titleA psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the evidence-based practice questionnaire for nurses-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10376178.2014.11081948-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84923294652-
dc.identifier.wosid000349385300002-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationContemporary Nurse, v.49, no.1, pp 4 - 14-
dc.citation.titleContemporary Nurse-
dc.citation.volume49-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage4-
dc.citation.endPage14-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaNursing-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryNursing-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCRITICAL THINKING-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVALIDATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusKNOWLEDGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPLEMENTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRANSLATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusATTITUDES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBARRIERS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVALIDITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBELIEFS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEBP-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorfactor analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorevidence-based practice-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpsychometrics-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Nursing > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE