Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 12 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Dosimetric effect of CT contrast agent in CyberKnife treatment plans

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hee Jung-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Ah Ram-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yang-Kyun-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Sung-Joon-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-12T00:45:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-12T00:45:13Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-18-
dc.identifier.issn1748-717X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/13282-
dc.description.abstractBackground: To investigate the effect of computed tomography (CT) contrast enhancement (CE) on the 3D dose distributions of non-coplanar small field beams in the CyberKnife (CK) treatment planning system (TPS) for the stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Methods: Twenty-two pre-CE CT treatment plans were recruited to this retrospective plan study. Their post-CE CT plans were based on the pre-CE CT plan data and calculated using the same MU and beam paths in either Ray-Tracing or Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. The differences in the doses of the beam path and the reference point between the pre- and post-CE CT plans were compared. The minimum, maximum, and mean doses in dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of target and organs-at-risk (OARs) were also compared. Results: The dose differences between the pre-and post-CE plans in a single beam path were less than 1.05% in both calculation algorithms, with respect to the prescription dose. At the center of the target volume, it was 1.9% (maximum 6.2%) in Ray-Tracing and 1.6% (maximum 4.0%) in MC. The CA effect showed on average 1.2% difference in the OAR maximum dose (maximum 7.8% in Ray-Tracing and 7.2% in MC). In the lung cases, the CT CE resulted in a dose difference of 2.4% (from 1.0% to 6.5%) without the calculation algorithm effect (maximum 20.3%). Conclusions: The CK treatment plan using the post-CE CT generally afforded less than 2% dose differences from the pre-CE CT plan. However, it could be up to 7.8% depending on the target positions in a body and be more than 20% with the calculation algorithms. Thus, the post-CE CT in CK treatment plans should be used with careful consideration for the CA effect, target position, and calculation algorithm factors.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.titleDosimetric effect of CT contrast agent in CyberKnife treatment plans-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1748-717X-8-244-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84885567463-
dc.identifier.wosid000327732500004-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRadiation Oncology, v.8-
dc.citation.titleRadiation Oncology-
dc.citation.volume8-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaOncology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryOncology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTRAVENOUS CONTRAST-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDOSE CALCULATIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNECK-CANCER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENHANCED CT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRADIOTHERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMEDIA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSCANS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLUNG-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHEAD-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCyberKnife-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCT contrast-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSmall field beam-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Radiation Oncology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Chang, Ah Ram photo

Chang, Ah Ram
College of Medicine (Department of Radiation Oncology)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE