Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 26 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Role of hybrid monolateral fixators in managing humeral length and deformity correction 23 patients (40 humeri) followed for 1-7 years

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorMalot, Rajat-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kwang-Won-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Sang-Heon-
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Hyeok-Nam-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Hae-Ryong-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-12T01:16:50Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-12T01:16:50Z-
dc.date.issued2013-06-
dc.identifier.issn1745-3674-
dc.identifier.issn1745-3682-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/13685-
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose Humeral lengthening and deformity correction are now being done increasingly for various etiologies. Monolateral external fixators have advantages over traditional Ilizarov circular fixators; they are easy to apply, they are less bulky, and they are therefore more convenient for the patient. We assessed the effectiveness of hybrid monolateral lateral fixators in humeral lengthening and deformity correction. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients (40 humeri) with various pathologies who underwent lengthening-with or without deformity correction using monolateral external fixator-between 2003 and 2008. Mean age at the time of the surgery was 14 (10-22) years. The mean follow-up time was 3.4 (1-7) years. Results The average duration of external fixator use was 8.3 (6-19) months. The mean lengthening achieved was 8.8 (4-11) cm and percentage lengthening was 49% (19-73). The healing index was 28 (13-60) days/cm. The major complications were refracture in 3 humeri and varus angulation of 2 humeri. The minor complications were superficial pin tract infection (6 segments), transient radial nerve palsy (1 segment), and elbow flexion contracture (5 segments). All complications resolved. Interpretation Hybrid monolateral fixators can be used for humeral lengthening and deformity correction. The advantage over circular fixators is that they are less bulky and patients can perform their day-to-day activities with the fixator in situ.-
dc.format.extent6-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.titleRole of hybrid monolateral fixators in managing humeral length and deformity correction 23 patients (40 humeri) followed for 1-7 years-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/17453674.2013.786636-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84878544000-
dc.identifier.wosid000319749900009-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationActa Orthopaedica, v.84, no.3, pp 280 - 285-
dc.citation.titleActa Orthopaedica-
dc.citation.volume84-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage280-
dc.citation.endPage285-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaOrthopedics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryOrthopedics-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNEONATAL GROWTH ARREST-
dc.subject.keywordPlusILIZAROV TECHNIQUE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusACHONDROPLASIA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPLICATIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTIBIA-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Orthopedic Surgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE