Balanced Propofol Sedation Versus Propofol Monosedation in Therapeutic Pancreaticobiliary Endoscopic Procedures
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Tae Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Chang Kyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Sang-Heum | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Suck-Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Il-Kwun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Hyun Jong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cha, Sang Woo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Moon, Jong Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Young Deok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hwangbo, Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sun-Joo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-12T02:47:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-12T02:47:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-08 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0163-2116 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-2568 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/14964 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Prolonged or complex endoscopic procedures are frequently performed under deep sedation. However, no studies of therapeutic ERCP have yet compared the use of balanced propofol sedation (BPS) to propofol alone, titrated to moderate levels of sedation. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was planned to compare the sedation efficacy and safety of BPS (propofol in combination with midazolam and fentanyl) and propofol monosedation in therapeutic ERCP and EUS. BPS, or propofol monosedation titrated to a moderate level of sedation, was performed by trained registered nurses under endoscopist supervision. The main outcome measurements included sedation efficacy focusing on recovery time, sedation safety, endoscopic procedure outcomes, and complications. There were no significant differences in sedation efficacy, safety, procedure outcomes, and complications, with the exception of recovery time. Mean recovery time (standard deviation) was 18.37 (7.86) min in BPS and 13.4 (6.24) min in propofol monosedation (P < 0.001). In a safety analysis, cardiopulmonary complication rates related to BPS and propofol monosedation were 7.8 % (8/102) and 9.6 % (10/104), respectively (P = 0.652). No patient required assisted ventilation or permanent termination of a procedure in either group. Technical success of the endoscopic procedures was 96.3 and 97.2 %, respectively (P = 0.701). Endoscopic procedure-related complications and outcomes did not differ depending on sedation procedure. Propofol monosedation by trained, registered sedation nurses under supervision resulted in a more rapid recovery time than BPS. There were no differences in the sedation safety, endoscopic procedure outcomes, and complications between BPS and propofol monosedation. | - |
dc.format.extent | 9 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers | - |
dc.title | Balanced Propofol Sedation Versus Propofol Monosedation in Therapeutic Pancreaticobiliary Endoscopic Procedures | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 네델란드 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10620-012-2234-0 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84866352029 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000306930100020 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Digestive Diseases and Sciences, v.57, no.8, pp 2113 - 2121 | - |
dc.citation.title | Digestive Diseases and Sciences | - |
dc.citation.volume | 57 | - |
dc.citation.number | 8 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 2113 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 2121 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | sci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HIGH-RISK OCTOGENARIANS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LOW-DOSE PROPOFOL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DEEP SEDATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODERATE SEDATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MONITORED ANESTHESIA | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ROUTINE ERCP | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Balanced propofol sedation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Propofol monosedation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Complication | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ERCP | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | EUS | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.