Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair and prolene hernia system for inguinal hernia; review of one surgeon's experience
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Yoon Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Sun Wook | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, Sang Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sung Yong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hur, Kyung Yul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kan, Gil Ho | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-12T03:46:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-12T03:46:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2233-7903 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/15465 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To compare the outcomes between laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and prolene hernia system (PHS) repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 237 patients scheduled for laparoscopic TEP or PHS repair of groin hernia from 2005 to 2009 was performed. Results: The mean age was 52.3 years in TEP group and 55.7 years in PHS group. Of 119 TEP cases, 98 were indirect inguinal hernia, 15 direct type, 5 femoral hernia and 1 complex hernia; Of 118 PHS cases, 100 indirect, 18 direct type. All in TEP group were performed under general anesthesia and 64% of PHS group were performed under spinal or epidural anesthesia. Preoperatively, 10 cases of recurrent inguinal hernia were involved in our study (4 in TEP, 6 in PHS group). The mean operative time was similar in both groups (74.8 in TEP, 71.2 in PHS group), however mean hospital stay (1.6 days in TEP, 3.2 days in PHS group, P = 0.018) and mean usage of analgesics (0.54 times in TEP, 2.03 times in PHS group, P < 0.01), complications (36 cases in TEP, 6 cases in PHS group, P < 0.01) showed statistical differences. There is only 1 case of postoperative recurrence inguinal hernia in PHS group but it has no statistical significance (P = 0.314). Conclusion: Compared to PHS repair, laparoscopic TEP repair has some advantages; shorter hospital stay, less frequent need of analgesics; as well as more postoperative complications such as hematoma, seroma, scrotal swelling. | - |
dc.format.extent | 5 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.title | Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair and prolene hernia system for inguinal hernia; review of one surgeon's experience | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.1.40 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84863047689 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000298713000007 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of the Korean Surgical Society, v.82, no.1, pp 40 - 44 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of the Korean Surgical Society | - |
dc.citation.volume | 82 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 40 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 44 | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001611662 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONTROLLED-TRIAL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FOLLOW-UP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HERNIOPLASTY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TEP | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Inguinal hernia | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Laparoscopy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Surgical mesh | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.