Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Current Status of External Quality Assessment of Fecal Occult Blood Test

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Soo Jin-
dc.contributor.authorCha, Young Joo-
dc.contributor.authorMin, Won-Ki-
dc.contributor.authorLee, You Kyoung-
dc.contributor.authorChae, Seok-Lae-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Bo-Moon-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hwan Sub-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-12T06:58:18Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-12T06:58:18Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-
dc.identifier.issn1598-6535-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/17480-
dc.description.abstractBackground : Nationwide external quality assessment (EQA) of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in Korea was first introduced in 2007-2009. The EQA results were analyzed to assess the current status of FOBT and to plan the continuation of the EQA program. Methods : The surveys included 40 hospitals in the preliminary survey conducted in 2007, 249 general hospitals in 2008, and 389 hospitals in 2009. In the surveys, the participating hospitals provided the results of the distributed materials and replies to the questionnaire on the FOBT test procedures and quality controls. Results : In the surveys conducted between 2007 and 2009, a total of 650 institutes submitted 653 test system results; 3 institutes used 2 kinds of methods. All of the institutes used immunologic methods; 107 institutes (16.5%) used quantitative equipments and 546 institutes (84.0%) used qualitative kits. Most quantitative tests yielded consistent positive or negative results; however, their cutoff and measured values differed according to the equipments used. A low-level material tested in 2007 was negative in the quantitative methods but positive in some qualitative methods because of lower detection limits. The discordance rates among quantitative tests were 3.2% in 2007, 4.4% in 2008, and 0% in 2009 and the rates among qualitative tests were 13.8% in 2008 and 2.6% in 2009. Semi-solid EQA materials showed the ability to evaluate the overall test procedures with acceptable stability. Conclusions : In the first Korean FOBT EQA, commercially available EQA materials were proven to be stable. Continuation of the EQA program and further education of laboratory personnel are needed to reduce inconsistency in results. Further, the test kit, procedures, and result reports must be standardized. (Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:726-33)-
dc.format.extent8-
dc.language한국어-
dc.language.isoKOR-
dc.publisherKorean Society for Laboratory Medicine-
dc.titleCurrent Status of External Quality Assessment of Fecal Occult Blood Test-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.726-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-78651317893-
dc.identifier.wosid000285530300029-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKorean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, v.30, no.6, pp 726 - 733-
dc.citation.titleKorean Journal of Laboratory Medicine-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage726-
dc.citation.endPage733-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART001498045-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMedical Laboratory Technology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMedical Laboratory Technology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROGRAM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCANCER-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFecal occult blood test-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorExternal quality assessment-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorColorectal neoplasm-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCancer screening-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Clinical Pathology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, You Kyoung photo

Lee, You Kyoung
College of Medicine (Department of Clinical Pathology)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE