판례평석: 국회의원의 심의표결권 침해에 대한 권한쟁의심판
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이상명 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-12T07:33:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-12T07:33:46Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-8062 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/18508 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The media bill was passed on 22 July 2009. When the roll call votes were less than a half of the registered members, the vice-speaker put the bill on the second vote and passed the bill. Ninety congressmen in the opposite political party set forth the decision should be annulled. The constitutional court adjudicated on competence disputes by 6 to 3 that the right of deliberate and votes cast was infringed. However, 7 out of 9 constitutional court judges dismiss the request for invalidity of media law. I argue that the majority decision of the constitutional court had three critical flaws. First, the right of question and discussion was violated during the procedure to pass the bill. Second, the principle not to deliberate the same measure twice during the same session was not uphold. Thus, the right of deliberate and votes cast of the opposing party members infringed. Last, the violated legislation procedure could not result in the valid media law. The constitutional court decision on media law did not limit the date to amend the law and only stated that the national assembly is accountable for holding the legislation procedure. To that end, the constitutional court decision merely suggests that the national assembly would decide whether to reconsider the media law. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한양법학회 | - |
dc.title | 판례평석: 국회의원의 심의표결권 침해에 대한 권한쟁의심판 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Media Law: Adjudication on Competence Disputes and the Right of Deliberate and Votes Cast | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이상명 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한양법학, no.29, pp.197 - 212 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 한양법학 | - |
dc.citation.title | 한양법학 | - |
dc.citation.number | 29 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 197 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 212 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001426829 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Right of Deliberate and Votes Cast | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Right of Question and Discussion | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Principle not to Deliberate the Same Measure Twice During the Same Session | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Adjudication on Competence Disputes | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 심의표결권 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 질의토론권 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 일사부재의 원칙 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 권한쟁의심판 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.