Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 2 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Multi-arterial phase MRI depicts inconsistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) subtypes in liver observations of patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma

Authors
Cunha, Guilherme MouraHasenstab, Kyle A.Delgado, TimoteoIchikawa, ShintaroLee, Min HeeDautt Medina, Paulette M.Kim, Soo JinLee, Young-HwanKwon, HeejinSirlin, Claude B.Fowler, Kathryn J.
Issue Date
1-Oct-2021
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Keywords
Liver; Magnetic resonance imaging; Hepatocellular carcinoma
Citation
European Radiology, v.31, no.10, pp 7594 - 7604
Pages
11
Journal Title
European Radiology
Volume
31
Number
10
Start Page
7594
End Page
7604
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/19299
DOI
10.1007/s00330-021-07924-8
ISSN
0938-7994
1432-1084
Abstract
Objectives According to LI-RADS, a major discriminating feature between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC malignancies is the subtype of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE). The aim of this study was to investigate whether APHE subtypes are consistent across multi-arterial phase (mHAP) MRI acquisitions while evaluating reader agreement. Secondarily, we investigated factors that may affect reader agreement for APHE subtype. Methods In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and focal observations who underwent mHAP were included. Five radiologists reviewed MR images in 2 reading sessions. In reading session 1, individual AP series were reviewed and scored for presence of APHE and subtype. In reading session 2, readers scored observations' major and ancillary features and LI-RADS category in the complete MRI examination. Reader agreement was calculated using Fleiss' kappa for binary outcomes and Kendall's coefficient of concordance for LI-RADS categories. Univariate mixed effects logistic regressions were performed to investigate factors affecting agreement. Results In total, 61 patients with 77 focal observations were analyzed. Of observations unanimously scored as having APHE, 27.7% showed both rim and nonrim subtypes on mHAP. Inter-reader agreement for APHE subtype ranged from 0.49 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.64) to 0.57 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.74) between reading sessions. Observation size had a trend level effect on rim APHE agreement (p = 0.052). Conclusion Approximately 1/3 of observations demonstrated inconsistent APHE subtype during mHAP acquisition. Small lesions were particularly challenging. Further guidance on APHE subtype classification, especially when applied to mHAP, could be a focus of LI-RADS refinement.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Radiology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Min Hee photo

Lee, Min Hee
College of Medicine (Department of Radiology)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE