Efficient use of ultrasound in cataract surgery
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bu, Jennifer J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Jinkwon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Afshari, Natalie A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-22T06:40:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-22T06:40:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1040-8738 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1531-7021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/20144 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose of review Modern phacoemulsification machines apply ultrasound through a variety of settings and parameters to remove a cataract. Using these new technologies efficiently is critical for both reducing surgical times and improving postoperative outcomes. The present article reviews recent findings in phacodynamics to explore the optimum use of ultrasound in cataract surgery. Recent findings In studies seeking to determine the optimum parameters in both fluidics and power, increased power and aspiration does not necessarily equate to more efficiency. New developments, such as torsional ultrasound, micropulse, and burst mode have shown increased efficiency in randomized control trials and in-vitro compared with conventional ultrasound. Regarding vacuums, the venturi pump has demonstrated greater efficiency compared with the peristaltic pump. We also explore other parameters, such as chamber pressure and tip selection. Meta-analyses on femtosecond-laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) have shown similar long-term visual outcomes compared to conventional cataract surgery. Though conventional cataract surgery remains highly effective, surgeons have increasing options for customizing their ultrasound settings and phacoemulsification techniques. | - |
dc.format.extent | 6 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd. | - |
dc.title | Efficient use of ultrasound in cataract surgery | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000821 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85120618494 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000725079400009 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, v.33, no.1, pp 41 - 46 | - |
dc.citation.title | Current Opinion in Ophthalmology | - |
dc.citation.volume | 33 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 41 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 46 | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Ophthalmology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Ophthalmology | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FEMTOSECOND LASER | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONVENTIONAL PHACOEMULSIFICATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TORSIONAL PHACOEMULSIFICATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SETTINGS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | VACUUM | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TIP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OPTIMIZATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | VENTURI | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CHATTER | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | fluidics | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | phacodynamics | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | phacoemulsification | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ultrasound | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cataract | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cataract surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | phaco power | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | pulse | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | burst | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.