Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Survey on the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the Korean Rhinologic Societyopen accessA Survey on the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the Korean Rhinologic Society

Other Titles
A Survey on the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the Korean Rhinologic Society
Authors
류광희백병준
Issue Date
2021
Publisher
대한비과학회
Keywords
Chronic rhinosinusitis; Medical treatment; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Survey; Guidelines.
Citation
Journal of Rhinology, v.28, no.1, pp 44 - 49
Pages
6
Journal Title
Journal of Rhinology
Volume
28
Number
1
Start Page
44
End Page
49
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/2167
DOI
10.18787/jr.2020.00343
ISSN
1229-1498
2384-4361
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There are several diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but specific guidelines have not been developed for Koreans. This study sought to evaluate and report CRS practice patterns of members of the Korean Rhinologic Society.Materials and Method: An anonymous survey including 32 items was conducted from August to September 2015. The survey items were categorized into three parts: general information, diagnosis and treatment of CRS, and endoscopic sinus surgery.Results: A total of 267 members participated in this survey. Almost half of the respondents (41.9%) were in their 40s and 42.7% had 10-20 years of experience. A total of 61.8% were private practitioners, while the rest worked in hospitals (38.2%). The prevalence rate of acute rhinosinusitis was higher in private clinics compared to hospitals (p<0.001). Intranasal steroids and saline irrigation were more commonly prescribed among hospital doctors compared to private practitioners (p<0.001). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the drug of choice for adult and pediatric CRS patients among private practitioners. However, hospital doctors preferred macrolides for adult CRS patients and third-generation cephalosporins for pediatric CRS patients. Most private clinics performed surgery under local anesthesia (90.8%), while those in a hospital setting preferred general anesthesia (78.4%). Revision surgery rates were higher in hospitals compared to private clinics (p<0.001).Conclusion: There were significant variations in CRS practice patterns between private clinics and hospitals. For effective and standardized diagnosis and management of CRS, appropriate local guidelines are needed.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Otorhinolaryngology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE