Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap as a Workhorse Flap: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Altiparmak, Mehmet | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cha, Han Gyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, Joon P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Suh, Hyunsuk Peter | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-11T08:32:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-11T08:32:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0743-684X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1098-8947 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/2450 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background There are various advantages and disadvantages attributed to superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap. The aim of this study is to evaluate the versatility and reliability of free SCIP flap by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature in terms of flap characteristics, pedicle types, and outcomes, including the different types of flap elevations. Methods PubMed, Embase OVID, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to January 2019. All original articles and case reports published in English were included in the analysis. Anatomic descriptions, cadaveric studies, conference presentations, letter to the editors, local SCIP flaps, and review articles were excluded. Results A total of 36 articles including 907 SCIP flaps were available for the analysis. The most frequent causes of defects were tumors (38.2%) and lower extremities were the most common recipient areas (62.7%). The average flap dimension was 73.323.0cm (2) with a pedicle length of 5.0 +/- 0.6cm. Vessel diameter average was 0.67 +/- 0.12mm. The average number of deep branch and superficial branch used per study was 14.4 +/- 8.7 (18%) and 93.3 +/- 75.0 (84%), respectively. Flap failure rate and complication rate were 2.7 and 4.2%, respectively. Conclusion SCIP flaps have been shown to be versatile in various aspects of reconstruction. The attributed disadvantages such as having short pedicle and small vessel diameter do not seem to limit the variable usage of this flap. Therefore, SCIP flap should be considered a workhorse flap. | - |
dc.format.extent | 6 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers | - |
dc.title | Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap as a Workhorse Flap: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1055/s-0040-1713666 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85090212897 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000565591600008 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, v.36, no.08, pp 600 - 605 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery | - |
dc.citation.volume | 36 | - |
dc.citation.number | 08 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 600 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 605 | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RECONSTRUCTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PUBLICATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HEAD | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | superficial circumflex iliac artery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | perforator flap | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | meta-analysis | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.