Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Long-term end-stage renal disease risks after living kidney donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jun Young-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Won Jae-
dc.contributor.authorDoo, Seung Whan-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jae Joon-
dc.contributor.authorGwon, Yong Nam-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ki Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae Heon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Do Kyung-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-14T06:01:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-14T06:01:46Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2369-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2369-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/25340-
dc.description.abstractBackgroundRecent studies have shown that donor nephrectomy can induce renal function impairment. However, few meta-analysis studies about this have proceeded. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis including all data of recent research studies was to determine whether living donor nephrectomy (LDN) could induce renal function impairment.MethodsBy November 2020, comprehensive literature searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Inclusion criteria were: (1) observational studies with data about overall end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) of living kidney donors, (2) control group consisted of people without donor nephrectomy, and (3) outcomes of studies included long-term end-stage renal disease risks after living kidney donation. Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool was used to evaluate our methodological quality.ResultsThe qualitative review included 11 studies and the meta-analysis included 5 studies. In the meta-analysis, the integrated overall ESRD risk was 5.57 (95% CI: 2.03-15.30). Regarding the overall risk of bias using ROBINS-I assessment tool, 0 studies was rated as "Low", 7 studies were rated as "moderate", 2 studies were rated as "Serious", and two studies were rated as "Critical".ConclusionsOur study showed that LDN increased ESRD risk in LDN patients. However, in our meta-analysis, variables in included studies were not uniform and the number of included studies was small. To have a definite conclusion, meta-analyses of well-planned and detailed studies need to be conducted in the future.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.titleLong-term end-stage renal disease risks after living kidney donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12882-023-03208-z-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85160635058-
dc.identifier.wosid000997700200001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMC Nephrology, v.24, no.1-
dc.citation.titleBMC Nephrology-
dc.citation.volume24-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaUrology & Nephrology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryUrology & Nephrology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITY-OF-LIFE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFUNCTIONAL RESERVE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDONORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMORTALITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRANSPLANTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRECIPIENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAGE-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorESRD-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLiving kidney donors-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSystematic review-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMeta-analysis-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Urology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Doo, seung whan photo

Doo, seung whan
College of Medicine (Department of Urology)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE