Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Laboratory Medicine: Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jang, Mi Ae | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Bohyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, You Kyoung | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-11T08:36:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-11T08:36:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2234-3806 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2234-3814 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/2889 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Poor reporting quality in diagnostic accuracy studies hampers an adequate judgment of the validity of the study. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement was published to improve the reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. This study aimed to evaluate the adherence of diagnostic accuracy studies published in Annals of Laboratory Medicine (ALM) to STARD 2015 and to identify directions for improvement in the reporting quality of these studies. Methods: Two independent authors assessed articles published in ALM between 2012-2018 for compliance with 30 STARD 2015 checklist items to identify all eligible diagnostic accuracy studies published during this period. We included 66 diagnostic accuracy studies. A total of the fulfilled STARD items were calculated, and adherence was analyzed on an individual-item basis. Results: The overall mean +/- SD number of STARD items reported for the included studies was 11.2 +/- 2.7. Only five (7.6%) studies adhered to more than 50% of the 30 items. No study satisfied more than 80% of the items. Large variability in adherence to reporting standards was detected across items, ranging from 0% to 100%. Conclusions: Adherence to STARD 2015 is suboptimal among diagnostic accuracy studies published in ALM. Our study emphasizes the necessity of adherence to STARD to improve the reporting quality of future diagnostic accuracy studies to be published in ALM. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | 대한진단검사의학회 | - |
dc.title | Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Laboratory Medicine: Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3343/alm.2020.40.3.245 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85077170649 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000504053400008 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Annals of Laboratory Medicine, v.40, no.3, pp 245 - + | - |
dc.citation.title | Annals of Laboratory Medicine | - |
dc.citation.volume | 40 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 245 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | + | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002579793 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Medical Laboratory Technology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medical Laboratory Technology | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | REAL-TIME PCR | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | UPDATED LIST | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STATEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | BIAS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Adherence | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Annals of Laboratory Medicine | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Diagnostic test | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Laboratory | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.