Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 28 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Challenges and Considerations in Sequence Variant Interpretation for Mendelian Disorders

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Young-Eun-
dc.contributor.authorKi, Chang-Seok-
dc.contributor.authorJang, Mi-Ae-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T09:24:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-11T09:24:39Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.issn2234-3806-
dc.identifier.issn2234-3814-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/4295-
dc.description.abstractIn 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), together with the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), published the latest guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants, which have been widely adopted into clinical practice. Despite these standardized efforts, the degrees of subjectivity and uncertainty allowed by the guidelines can lead to inconsistent variant classification across clinical laboratories, making it difficult to assess the pathogenicity of identified variants. We describe the critical elements of variant interpretation processes and potential pitfalls through practical examples and provide updated information based on a review of recent literature. The variant classification we describe is meant to be applicable to sequence variants for Mendelian disorders, whether identified by single-gene tests, multi-gene panels, exome sequencing, or genome sequencing. Continuing efforts to improve the reproducibility and objectivity of sequence variant interpretation across individuals and laboratories are needed.-
dc.format.extent9-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisher대한진단검사의학회-
dc.titleChallenges and Considerations in Sequence Variant Interpretation for Mendelian Disorders-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.3343/alm.2019.39.5.421-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85065500490-
dc.identifier.wosid000466479900001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAnnals of Laboratory Medicine, v.39, no.5, pp 421 - 429-
dc.citation.titleAnnals of Laboratory Medicine-
dc.citation.volume39-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage421-
dc.citation.endPage429-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.identifier.kciidART002498447-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMedical Laboratory Technology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMedical Laboratory Technology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCLINICAL INTERPRETATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusUNCERTAIN SIGNIFICANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusACMG RECOMMENDATIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFUNCTIONAL IMPACT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGENETIC-VARIANTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusKOREAN PATIENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCLASSIFICATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPATHOGENICITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGUIDELINES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTANDARDS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAmerican College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMendelian disorder-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorVariant interpretation-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Clinical Pathology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE