Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve Insights From Intracoronary Imaging and Physiological Assessment
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ahn, Sung Gyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Suh, Jon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hung, Olivia Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Hee Su | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bouchi, Yasir H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zeng, Wenjie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gandhi, Rounak | - |
dc.contributor.author | Eshtehardi, Parham | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gogas, Bill D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Samady, Habib | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-11T14:44:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-11T14:44:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-05-22 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1936-8798 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1876-7605 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/sch/handle/2021.sw.sch/7557 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the epicardial and microvascular substrates associated with discordances between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) values. BACKGROUND Discordances between FFR and CFR remain poorly characterized. METHODS FFR, hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR), and intravascular ultrasound were performed as indexes of epicardial function and CFR and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) as measures of microvascular function in 94 patients with moderate coronary stenosis. Maximal plaque burden (PBmax), HSR, and HMR were calculated in 4 quadrants based on values of FFR <= 0.80 and CFR <= 2.0 as follows: concordant normal (preserved FFR and CFR), concordant abnormal (low FFR and CFR), discordant low FFR and preserved CFR, and discordant preserved FFR and low CFR. RESULTS Sixty-four patients (68%) had concordant FFR and CFR findings, and 30 patients (32%) had discordant FFR and CFR. Compared with patients with preserved FFR and CFR, those with low FFR and CFR had higher PBmax (p = 0.003), higher HSR (p < 0.001), and similar HMR. Among patients with preserved FFR, those with reduced CFR had similar PBmax and HSR but a trend toward higher HMR (p = 0.058) compared with patients with preserved CFR. Among patients with reduced FFR, those with preserved CFR had lower PBmax (p = 0.004), a trend toward lower HSR (p = 0.065), and lower HMR (p = 0.03) compared with patients with reduced CFR. Furthermore, compared with patients with preserved FFR and low CFR, those with low FFR and preserved CFR had higher HSR (p = 0.022) but lower HMR (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS In patients with moderate coronary stenosis, preserved FFR and low CFR is associated with increased microvascular resistance, while low FFR and preserved CFR has modest epicardial stenosis and preserved microvascular function. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College Cardiology Foundation. | - |
dc.format.extent | 9 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | - |
dc.title | Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve Insights From Intracoronary Imaging and Physiological Assessment | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.006 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85019251360 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000402417800007 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, v.10, no.10, pp 999 - 1007 | - |
dc.citation.title | JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions | - |
dc.citation.volume | 10 | - |
dc.citation.number | 10 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 999 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1007 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | sci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Cardiovascular System & Cardiology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ARTERY-DISEASE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MICROCIRCULATORY RESISTANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MICROVASCULAR RESISTANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIFFUSE ATHEROSCLEROSIS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EXPERT CONSENSUS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | VELOCITY RESERVE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PROGNOSTIC VALUE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FOLLOW-UP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STENOSIS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | blood flow velocity | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | coronary atherosclerosis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | intravascular ultrasonography | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | microvascular angina | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | myocardial fractional flow reserve | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114
COPYRIGHT 2021 by SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.