ScholarWorks@SOONCHUNHYANG UNIVERSITY: Cheong, Jin seong

Detailed Information

Cheong, Jin seong (정진성)

College of Humanities and Social Sciences (Department of Police Administration)

Research Area

Tel
E-mail
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

상호효과:6||Workplace Sexual Harassment:6||Reciprocal Effect:6||직장 내 성희롱:6||Structural Characteristics:5||교차지연 패널모형:5||CrossLagged Panel Model:5||Logistic Regression Analysis:4||Homicide:4||Negative Binomial Regression Analysis:4||청소년 비행:4||살인범죄:4||Juvenile Delinquency:4||Negative Binomial Regression Model:3||성범죄:3||구조적 특성:3||Neighborhood Research:3||Sexual Violence:3||Parenting:3||Spatial Autocorrelation:3||Sex Crime:3||Driver's License Suspension:2||Longterm Effect:2||지역사회연구:2||Policing:2||방범용 CCTV:2||방법론적 이슈:2||Imprisonment:2||MAUP:2||범죄두려움:2||MSDS:2||structural characteristics:2||양육방식:2||DWI:2||Delinquent Peers:2||South Korea:2||비교법:2||Autoregressive CrossLagged Panel Model:2||Analysis of Covariance(ANCOVA):2||비행의 경중:2||비행친구:2||가산자료:2||사회구조적 특성:2||위계적 선형모형:2||Spatial Regression Model:2||교통안전:2||Gender Difference:2||Comparative Study:2||음이항 회귀모형:2||음이항 회귀분석:2||Abidance Duration:2||음이항회귀분석:2||생태학적 관점:2||생태학적 범죄이론:2||Broken Windows Theory:2||Latent Fingerprint:2||Fear of Crime:2||Ruvis:2||Traffic Safety:2||Traffic Safety Education:2||자기회귀 교차지연 패널모형:2||잠재지문:2||성별 차이:2||성폭력:2||CA:2||Fine:2||경찰 물리력 사용 가이드라인:2||로지스틱회귀분석:2||Effectiveness of Punishment:2||무질서:2||Police Use of Force Guideline:2||Interaction (Moderating) Effect:1||Interaction Theory:1||Japanese Criminal Law:1||Job Description:1||Job Satisfaction:1||KCVS:1||Legal Limits of Police Use of Deadly Force:1||LessthanLethal Weapon:1||Level of Satisfaction:1||Literature Review:1||Local Moran’s I:1||Logistic Regression Model:1||Longitudinal Study:1||MacroLevel Factor:1||Measurement:1||Medical Examination:1||Men:1||Merton:1||Methodological Issue:1||Methodological Issues:1||Moderated Mediating Effect:1||Morale Elevation:1||MultiLevel Analysis:1||Nearest Neighbor Hierarchical Clustering (NNH):1||Neighborhood Bond:1||Neighborhood Disorder:1||Neighborhood Structural Characteristics:1||NonAssertive Response:1||Objective Reasonableness:1||Objective Reasonableness Standard:1||Objectively Reasonable Mistake:1||Organizational Factors:1||Overview of Past Studies:1||Penal Code:1||Perceived Disorder:1||Perceived Seriousness:1||Perception of CCTV:1||Perception of Public Safety:1||Performance Appraisal:1||PerformanceBased Management System:1||Physical Disorder:1||Physical Structure:1||Pig Skin:1||Police Civilianization:1||Police Deadly Force:1||Police Image:1||Police LessthanLethal Force:1||Police Position:1||Police Selection:1||Police Shooting Drill:1||Police Training:1||Police Use of Deadly Force:1||Police Use of Force:1||Police stress:1||Police use of force:1||Powder Method:1||Preference:1||Press Relations:1||Prevention Program:1||Proper Police Handgun Use:1||Qualitative Method:1||Rape:1||Rationality:1||Reagent Method:1||Reasonable Mistake:1||Research Design:1||Resident Contact:1||Residential Security:1||Risk‐adjusted Nearest Neighbor Hierarchical Clustering (RNNH):1||Routine Activities Theory:1||Safety Guideline:1||Scale Effect:1||SelfControl:1||SelfEfficacy:1||Severity of Delinquency:1||Severity of Offense:1||Severity of Victimization:1||Sex Crime Type:1||Sex Intercourse without Consent:1||Sex Offences Act 2003:1||Sexual Harassment:1||Sexual Harassment Victimization:1||Sincerity:1||Skin of Carcass:1||Social Bond (Control) Theory:1||Social Identity Theory:1||Social Structure:1||Social and Environmental Factors:1||South Korean Police:1||Spatial Analysis:1||SplitSecond Judgment:1||Stalking:1||Stalking punishment bill:1||Status Delinquency:1||Stress:1||Structural equation modelling:1||SuperLeader:1||Theorydriven Measure:1||Traffic Law Violation:1||Transfer Method:1||Types of Responses:1||Use of Excessive Force:1||Victim Blame:1||Victim Protection:1||Victimization Experience:1||Weights:1||Women’s Fear of Crime:1||Youths in juvenile training school:1||ZeroTolerance:1||academic performance:1||analysis of network:1||biosocial criminology:1||broken windows:1||broken windows theory:1||crimespecific approach:1||crosslevel interaction effect:1||cyanoacrylate:1||delinquent peers:1||depressed:1||differential police response:1||ecological perspective:1||elfLeadership:1||evidence based:1||executive functions:1||fleeing vehicle:1||geneenvironment correlation (rGE):1||geneenvironment interaction:1||global positioning system:1||hierarchical linear model:1||highspeed pursuit:1||homicide:1||hot spot:1||human trafficking:1||human trafficking prevention act:1||individualized approach.:1||intelligence:1||latent fingerprint:1||legislation:1||narrative lecture evaluation:1||neighborhood disorder:1||physical disorder:1||physiological tests:1||police lethal/lessthanlethal equipment:1||prostitution:1||quality of education:1||recidivism(reincarceration):1||rehabilitation:1||relative humidity:1||sex crime:1||social learning theory:1||spatial analysis:1||spatial dependence:1||spatial error model:1||spatial regression analysis:1||stress:1||temperature:1||tool for screening:1||vacuum chamber:1||victim:1||가변적 공간단위의 문제(MAUP):1||가정폭력 처벌법:1||가족복원(family restoration):1||가중치:1||간접효과(Indirect) Effect:1||강간:1||강력범죄(serious crime):1||강화 전략:1||개별화 접근:1||객관적 합리성:1||객관적 합리성의 원칙:1||객관적으로 합리적인 실수:1||거버넌스 패러다임:1||거시원인:1||거주지방범:1||건강검진:1||경로모형(Path Analysis Model):1||경찰 권총 사용:1||경찰 물리력 사용:1||경찰 비살상 물리력:1||경찰 살상 물리력:1||경찰 이미지:1||경찰관 선발:1||경찰보직:1||경찰의 민간화:1||경찰활동:1||고속추격:1||고전적 긴장:1||공간 종속성:1||공간 회귀분석:1||공간분석:1||공간자기상관:1||공간적 자기상관:1||공간회귀(spatial regression):1||공간회귀모델:1||공분산분석:1||과잉 물리력사용:1||과학수사요원:1||교육의 질:1||교육훈련:1||교정교화사업:1||교통단속:1||교통법규위반:1||교통안전교육:1||구금형:1||구조 공변량(structural covariates):1||구조적 지역특성:1||권총 사용 방법:1||권총 사용 한계:1||권총사격 훈련:1||긴급한 판단:1||깨진유리창 이론:1||깨진유리창이론:1||남녀차이:1||네트워크 분석:1||다층모형분석:1||도주 피의자:1||도주차량:1||돼지피부:1||로지스틱 회귀모형:1||로지스틱 회귀분석:1||머튼:1||무관용:1||무질서 인식:1||무질서와 범죄:1||문헌 연구:1||문헌검토:1||문화와 정책:1||물리적 구조:1||물리적 무질서:1||발생원인:1||벌금형:1||범죄:1||범죄두려움(Fear of Crime):1||범죄예방:1||범죄예방(crime prevention):1||범죄예방정책(crime prevention policy):1||부모 양육:1||분말법:1||비동의간음죄:1||비살상 물리력:1||사기 제고:1||사회 구조:1||사회유대이론:1||사회정체성이론:1||사회학습이론:1||삶의 질(Quality of Life:1||상호작용(조절)효과:1||상호작용이론:1||생리학적 검사:1||생물사회학적 범죄학:1||서술형 강의평가:1||선호도:1||설명력:1||설치인식:1||성 범죄:1||성 중립성:1||성과주의:1||성매매:1||성범죄 유형:1||성별:1||성폭력 범죄:1||성폭력두려움:1||성희롱:1||성희롱 심각성인식:1||성희롱 예방교육:1||성희롱 피해:1||센서스(Census):1||셀프리더십:1||셉테드:1||소극적 대응:1||소년원학교 여자 청소년:1||수사·민원부서 기피:1||슈퍼리더:1||스케일효과:1||스케일효과(scale effect):1||스토킹:1||스토킹 처벌법:1||스트레스:1||시민접촉:1||시약법:1||시체피부:1||식별기준:1||실증연구:1||안전가이드라인:1||억제이론:1||언론관계:1||업무수행능력평가:1||여성범죄:1||여성의 범죄두려움:1||연구 설계:1||영국 2003년 성범죄법:1||예방교육 만족도:1||예방정책:1||왜곡된 성인지:1||우울:1||운전면허 정지:1||위계적선형모형(HLM):1||위치정보:1||위해성 경찰장비:1||위험:1||위험도반영 최근린계층군집(RNNH):1||음 이항 회귀모델:1||음주운전:1||읍면동:1||이론에 근거한 측정:1||인과관계:1||인식 요인:1||인신매매:1||인신매매방지법:1||일반직 공무원:1||일본 형법:1||일상활동이론:1||임박한 위험:1||입법:1||자기통제력:1||자기효능감:1||장기적 효과:1||재범(재복역):1||전국범죄피해조사:1||전사법:1||절차적 정의:1||정보공개:1||정서문제:1||제도적 동형화:1||조절된 매개효과:1||조직적 요인:1||종단 연구:1||준수기간:1||중요도 평가:1||증거기반:1||지역사회 경찰활동:1||지역사회 구조적 특성:1||지역사회 범죄연구(neighborhood crime research):1||지역사회 변수:1||지역유대:1||지역특성(규모):1||지위비행:1||직무 기술:1||진정성:1||진정직업자격:1||청소년:1||체감안전:1||최근린계층군집(NNH):1||측정:1||층위간 상호작용효:1||층위간 상호작용효과:1||컴스탯:1||통합모형:1||평균효과:1||피해 대응방식:1||피해 심각성:1||피해경험:1||피해자:1||피해자 보호:1||피해자비난:1||학습 긴장:1||한국:1||합리성:1||합리적인 실수:1||핫스팟:1||행정동:1||형벌효과:1||형법:1||환경에 미치는 영향 요인:1||환경적 적응:1||효과성:1||Adolescents:1||Antecedents:1||AntiCrime CCTV:1||AntiSexual Harassment Training:1||AntiStoke:1||Antistoke:1||Averaging Effect:1||Biosocial Criminology:1||Bona Fide Occupational Qualfication:1||CA Dyeing:1||CA염색:1||CCTV:1||CPTED:1||Causal Relationship:1||Civilian Officer:1||Classic Strain:1||Cognitive Factor:1||Community Characteristics (Size):1||CommunityOriented Policing:1||Composite Model:1||Compstat:1||Count Data:1||CountData:1||Crime:1||Crime Hot Spots:1||Crime Prevention:1||Crime Scene Investigator:1||Crime Victimization):1||Crime against Women:1||CrossLevel Interaction Effect:1||Culture and Policy:1||Deterrence Theory:1||Disorder:1||Disorder and Crime:1||Distorted Perception on Gender:1||Domestic violence punishment bill:1||Dong District:1||Due Process:1||Email Interview:1||Ecological Crime Perspective:1||Ecological Crime Theory:1||Ecological Factors:1||Ecological Perspective:1||Educational Strain:1||Effectiveness:1||Emotional Disturbance:1||Empirical Research:1||Enforcement:1||Enhancing Strategies:1||Environmental adaptation:1||Eup·Myeon·Dong:1||Evasion of Investigation and Civil Affairs Position:1||Explanatory Power:1||Fear of Sexual Assault:1||Fleeing Suspects:1||GAM(Geographical Analysis Machine):1||GPS 위치추적:1||Gel Lifter:1||Gel lifter:1||Gender:1||Gender Differences in Causal Process:1||Gender Neutrality:1||Governance Paradigm:1||Hazard:1||Hierarchical Linear Model:1||Hierarchical Linear Modeling:1||Immediate Danger:1||Importance Evaluation:1||Information Disclosure:1||Institutional Isomorphism:1||

STATISTICS: Total View :1,233,182; Today View :125

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

(31538) 22, Soonchunhyang-ro, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea+82-41-530-1114

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE