Detailed Information

Cited 22 time in webofscience Cited 24 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Robust future-oriented technology portfolios: Black-Litterman approach

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorShin, J[Shin, Juneseuk]-
dc.contributor.authorCoh, BY[Coh, Byoung-Youl]-
dc.contributor.authorLee, C[Lee, Changyong]-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T10:59:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-04T10:59:52Z-
dc.date.created2016-08-06-
dc.date.issued2013-11-
dc.identifier.issn0033-6807-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/58724-
dc.description.abstractWe propose a new way of constructing more robust technology portfolios to overcome the weaknesses of previous technology portfolios based either on the judgments of experts or on quantitative data such as patents. Instead of using historical data, the method of nonlinear forecasting enables us to forecast the future number of patent citations and accordingly, to use the forecast as a quantitative proxy for future returns and risks of technologies. Using the Black-Litterman portfolio model, we improve the accuracy of inputs by combining the future views of experts with the future returns and risks of technologies. As a consequence of this, the portfolio becomes strongly future-oriented. With our approach, corporate managers use both experts and data more effectively to build robust technology portfolios. In particular, our method is of great help for companies launching new businesses because the method avoids heavy dependency on internal experts with little knowledge about emerging technologies. A company entering the molecular amplification instrument market is exemplified herein.-
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL-
dc.subjectREAL OPTIONS VALUATION-
dc.subjectR-AND-D-
dc.subjectDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS-
dc.subjectPRODUCT DEVELOPMENT-
dc.subjectPATENT ANALYSIS-
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT-
dc.subjectSELECTION-
dc.subjectDECISIONS-
dc.subjectFRONTIER-
dc.subjectMODEL-
dc.titleRobust future-oriented technology portfolios: Black-Litterman approach-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, J[Shin, Juneseuk]-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/radm.12022-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84886237037-
dc.identifier.wosid000325922900001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationR & D MANAGEMENT, v.43, no.5, pp.409 - 419-
dc.relation.isPartOfR & D MANAGEMENT-
dc.citation.titleR & D MANAGEMENT-
dc.citation.volume43-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage409-
dc.citation.endPage419-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREAL OPTIONS VALUATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusR-AND-D-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRODUCT DEVELOPMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPATENT ANALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSELECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDECISIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFRONTIER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMODEL-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Engineering > Department of Systems Management Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher SHIN, JUNE SEUK photo

SHIN, JUNE SEUK
Engineering (Systems Management Engineering)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE