Finding the optimal cutoff value for amyloid beta positivity using the iterative outlier method and concordance rate
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, HR[Kim, Hang-Rai] | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choe, YS[Choe, Yeong Sim] | - |
dc.contributor.author | Moon, SH[Moon, Seung Hwan] | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, HJ[Kim, Hee Jin] | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jang, H[Jang, Hyemin] | - |
dc.contributor.author | Na, DL[Na, Duk L.] | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, S[Park, Seongbeom] | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seo, SW[Seo, Sang Won] | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-25T01:44:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-25T01:44:05Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-25 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2508-7940 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/89466 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to calculate the cutoff value for amyloid beta (A beta) positron emission tomography (PET) positivity using the iterative outlier method and to evaluate its validity based on the concordance rate. Methods: We performed the iterative outlier method on 373 cognitively unimpaired (CU) subjects and calculated the optimal cutoff value for A beta positivity. The validation was performed using the independent dataset, comprising 83 subjects (27 CU, 27 amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and 29 Alzheimer's dementia). We evaluated the validity of the A beta cutoff value by calculating its concordance rate with the visual assessment and between two different A beta tracers performed in the same subject. Results: The concordance rate of A beta cutoff values with the visual assessment ranged from 84.3% to 91.5%, depending on the reference regions. The concordance rate of the cutoff values between the two A beta tracers ranged from 90.3% to 97.5%, all of which were higher than that of the visual assessment (86.7%). Conclusion: We demonstrated that the iterative outlier method could identify the cutoff value for A beta PET positivity. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SUNGKYUNKWAN UNIV SCH MEDICINE | - |
dc.subject | COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT | - |
dc.subject | ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE | - |
dc.subject | PET | - |
dc.subject | BURDEN | - |
dc.title | Finding the optimal cutoff value for amyloid beta positivity using the iterative outlier method and concordance rate | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, HR[Kim, Hang-Rai] | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Choe, YS[Choe, Yeong Sim] | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Moon, SH[Moon, Seung Hwan] | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, HJ[Kim, Hee Jin] | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Na, DL[Na, Duk L.] | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Seo, SW[Seo, Sang Won] | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.23838/pfm.2021.00023 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000668200100006 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE, v.5, no.2, pp.83 - 89 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE | - |
dc.citation.title | PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE | - |
dc.citation.volume | 5 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 83 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 89 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | General & Internal Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medicine, General & Internal | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PET | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | BURDEN | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Alzheimer disease | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Amyloid | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Positron-emission tomography | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(03063) 25-2, SUNGKYUNKWAN-RO, JONGNO-GU, SEOUL, KOREAsamsunglib@skku.edu
COPYRIGHT © 2021 SUNGKYUNKWAN UNIVERSITY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.