스피노자와 유물론적 해석 －스피노자 철학에 대한 햄프셔의 해석－

Abstract

For Spinoza, the relative weighting of thought and extension is equal, and therefore neither can we give greater weight to the body nor to the mind: the body is not prior to the mind nor vice versa. However, from time to time, some commentators give weight either to one or to the other. Furthermore, among the various interpretations of Spinoza's mind-body problem, there is a notable materialistic point of view: modified materialism by Stuart Hampshire. In this paper, I considered the appropriateness of his perspective on Spinoza and discussed some of the problems which arise from his interpretation and some of the inadequacy of applying it to Spinoza's mind-body theory. For Hampshire, the physical aspect is more coherent and fuller than the mental, and he sees Spinoza as a (non-reductive) materialist. Therefore, it is problematic to adopt Hampshire's interpretation as Spinoza's mind-body theory. Spinozistic identity between the mind and the body should be found in that which encompasses both the mental and physical, and thus Spinoza’s theory should be regarded as monism with materialism and idealism as the double aspects of his monistic substance.