Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 박애자 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 최지혜 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 강현 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박기정 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김하영 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김서화 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김덕윤 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박승환 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 하용찬 | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-08T19:40:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2287-6375 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2287-7029 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/10931 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Although dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is known to standard equipment for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Different results of BMD measurement using a number of different types of devices are difficult to use clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate discrepancy and standardizations of DXA devices from three manufactures using a European Spine Phantom (ESP). Methods: We calculated the accuracy and precision of 36 DXA devices from three manufacturers (10 Hologic, 16 Lunar, and 10 Osteosys) using a ESP (semi-anthropomorphic). The ESP was measured 5 times on each equipment without repositioning. Accuracy was assessed by comparing BMD (g/cm2 ) values measured on each device with the actual value of the phantom. Precision was assessed by the coefficient of variation (CVsd). Results: Lunar devices were, on average, 22%, 8.3%, and 5% overestimation for low (L1) BMD values, medium (L2) and high (L3) BMD values. Hologic devices were, on average, 6% overestimation for L1 BMD, and 5% and 6.2% underestimation for L2 and L3 BMD values. Osteosys devices was, on average, 12.7% (0.063 g/cm2 ), 6.3% (0.062 g/cm2 ), and 5% (0.075 g/ cm2 ) underestimation for L1, L2, and L3, respectively. The mean CVsd for L1-L3 BMD were 0.01%, 0.78%, and 2.46% for Lunar, Hologic, and Osteosys devices respectively. Conclusions: The BMD comparison in this study demonstrates that BMD result of three different devices are significant different between three devices. Differences of BMD between three devices are necessary to BMD standardization. | - |
dc.format.extent | 5 | - |
dc.publisher | 대한골대사학회 | - |
dc.title | Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.11005/jbm.2015.22.2.45 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 대한골대사학회지, v.22, no.2, pp 45 - 49 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001995909 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 49 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 45 | - |
dc.citation.title | 대한골대사학회지 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 22 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Bone density | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Densitometry | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Lumbar vertebrae | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Reference standards | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.