Comparison of absorbable mesh plate versus titanium-dynamic mesh plate in reconstruction of blow-out fracture: An analysis of long-term outcomesopen access
- Authors
- Baek, W.I.; Kim, H.K.; Kim, W.S.; Bae, T.H.
- Issue Date
- Jul-2014
- Publisher
- Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
- Keywords
- Absorbable implants; Orbital fractures; Orbital implants; Titanium
- Citation
- Archives of Plastic Surgery, v.41, no.4, pp 355 - 361
- Pages
- 7
- Journal Title
- Archives of Plastic Surgery
- Volume
- 41
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 355
- End Page
- 361
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/13872
- DOI
- 10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.355
- ISSN
- 2234-6163
2234-6171
- Abstract
- Background A blow-out fracture is one of the most common facial injuries in midface trauma. Orbital wall reconstruction is extremely important because it can cause various functional and aesthetic sequelae. Although many materials are available, there are no uniformly accepted guidelines regarding material selection for orbital wall reconstruction. Methods From January 2007 to August 2012, a total of 78 patients with blow-out fractures were analyzed. 36 patients received absorbable mesh plates, and 42 patients received titanium-dynamic mesh plates. Both groups were retrospectively evaluated for therapeutic efficacy and safety according to the incidence of three different complications: enophthalmos, extraocular movement impairment, and diplopia. Results For all groups (inferior wall fracture group, medial wall fractrue group, and combined inferomedial wall fracture group), there were improvements in the incidence of each complication regardless of implant types. Moreover, a significant improvement of enophthalmos occurred for both types of implants in group 1 (inferior wall fracture group). However, we found no statistically significant differences of efficacy or complication rate in every groups between both implant types. Conclusions Both types of implants showed good results without significant differences in long-term follow up, even though we expected the higher recurrent enophthalmos rate in patients with absorbable plate. In conclusion, both types seem to be equally effective and safe for orbital wall reconstruction. In particular, both implant types significantly improve the incidence of enophthalmos in cases of inferior orbital wall fractures. © 2014 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/13872)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.