Detailed Information

Cited 7 time in webofscience Cited 7 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effects of Combination Therapy with Cilostazol and Probucol versus Monotherapy with Cilostazol on Coronary Plaque, Lipid and Biomarkers: SECURE Study, a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Authors
Ko, Young-GukChoi, Seung-HyukKang, Woong CholLee, Byoung KwonKim, Sang WookShim, Won-Heum
Issue Date
2014
Publisher
JAPAN ATHEROSCLEROSIS SOC
Keywords
Atherosclerosis; Coronary artery disease; Probucol; Cilostazol
Citation
JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, v.21, no.8, pp 816 - 830
Pages
15
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS
Volume
21
Number
8
Start Page
816
End Page
830
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/13984
DOI
10.5551/jat.22657
ISSN
1340-3478
1880-3873
Abstract
Aim: The study aim is to investigate synergistic effects of cilostazol and probucol combination therapy on coronary plaque volume and composition. Methods: A total of 119 patients undergoing coronary stenting were treated with probucol and cilostazol combination therapy (group.) or with cilostazol monotherapy (group.) in a double-blind, randomized multicenter trial, and evaluated by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) at baseline and 9-month follow-up for changes in coronary plaque volume and composition at an index intermediate lesion with luminal narrowing >= 30% and < 70% and for neointimal hyperplasia at the stented segment. In all patients simvastatin 20 mg was started with enrollment. Results: Qualifying VH-IVUS data from 91 patients were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between group. and. with respect to the primary endpoint, nominal change in normalized total atheroma volume (TAV) of the index intermediate coronary lesion (Delta -12.6 +/- 17.7 vs. -14.2 +/- 20.2 mm(3), p= 0.691), or plaque composition. Plaque regression was observed in more than 70% of patients in both groups. Diabetes was the only significant independent determinant of changes in TAV (beta = 0.22, p = 0.037). There were greater decreases in total cholesterol (Delta -51.8 +/- 33.0 vs. -25.4 +/- 39.1 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and LDL (Delta -33.5 +/- 30.5 vs. -20.3 +/- 30.8 mg/dL, p = 0.044) levels in group. than in group I. However, HDL cholesterol (Delta -11.2 +/- 8.5 vs. 2.7 +/- 7.7 mg/dL, p< 0.001) and apoA1 (Delta -18.2 +/- 21.4 vs. 10.0 +/- 16.5 mg/dL, p < 0.001) levels were also significantly decreased in group. compared with group II. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in changes in plaque volume or composition between the cilostazol and probucol combination therapy and cilostazol monotherapy group despite different impacts of the treatments on lipid biomarkers.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Sang Wook photo

Kim, Sang Wook
의과대학 (의학부(임상-광명))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE