The motivations of external whistleblowers and their impact on the intention to blow the whistle again
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, Heungsik | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lewis, David | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-28T03:32:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0962-8770 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1467-8608 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/18468 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to inquire into the relative importance of morality, cost-benefit, and emotion as motivations for the decision to blow the whistle externally, and the effects of such factors as motivations, perceived negative consequences, and preferences for reform on the intention to blow the whistle again. Based on a literature review, we formulated some hypotheses and, to test them, we used the data collected from a survey of 127 external whistleblowers in South Korea. The results revealed that morality was the most important motivation, followed by emotion, and then cost-benefit, which thus, seemed to be the least important for the whistleblowers. Morality as a motivation and the perceived negative consequences of whistleblowing had a significant effect on the intention to blow the whistle again. This study helps advance the understanding of the motivations behind whistleblowing and the factors that influence the intention to blow the whistle again. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd | - |
dc.format.extent | 12 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd | - |
dc.title | The motivations of external whistleblowers and their impact on the intention to blow the whistle again | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/beer.12224 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Business Ethics, v.28, no.3, pp 379 - 390 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000471931800008 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85061281395 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 390 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 379 | - |
dc.citation.title | Business Ethics | - |
dc.citation.volume | 28 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RETALIATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EMPLOYEES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGERS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DECISION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ETHICS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODEL | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Social Sciences - Other Topics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Business | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Ethics | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.