Detailed Information

Cited 5 time in webofscience Cited 5 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Stress relaxation cracking in 304H stainless steel weld of a chemical reactor serviced at 560 degrees C

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Kee Bong-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Jong Min-
dc.contributor.authorTuan Son Nguyen-
dc.date.available2019-05-28T11:32:03Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-
dc.identifier.issn1350-6307-
dc.identifier.issn1873-1961-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/19061-
dc.description.abstractCircumferential cracking was found in 304H stainless steel welds between the nozzle and end-plate of a Stylene Monomer (SM) reactor serviced at 560 degrees C. The cracks had been repaired, but they repeatedly reappeared after two years of service. Since this reactor and the relevant piping system were constructed as an addition between two existing reactors through a change of process design, the nozzle and connected piping were quite compact. Hence, the pipe system stress by thermal load was a concern. The system stress analysis was conducted using AutoPipe, with the overall pipe modeling connecting the three reactors. The model of 132 m length included various expansion joints, elbows, pipe supports, hangers, tees and reducers. Locations with high system stress were identified, and the system load at the cracking location was determined. The reactor was originally designed for 650 degrees C, but was actually used at the much lower temperature of 535-565 degrees C. The local temperature difference along the height of the reactor was not negligible, and could generate considerable thermal stress at the cracking location. Detailed finite element analysis was conducted for the cracking location, using ABAQUS. An axi-symmetric model was used for the reactor and the internals. The measured temperature boundary conditions and the load boundary conditions obtained from the pipe stress analysis were employed. Thermal stress, gravitational stress, and pressure stress were calculated at the cracking location during the startup and shutdown as well as during the steady operation period. Finally, the metallurgical characteristics of 304H were investigated. The welding process of the repair was checked. Reheat cracking or stress relaxation cracking was the most suspected reason for cracking. Several suggestions were also made to prevent further cracking. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.format.extent12-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.titleStress relaxation cracking in 304H stainless steel weld of a chemical reactor serviced at 560 degrees C-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.01.014-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, v.56, pp 288 - 299-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.wosid000361832300029-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84941993208-
dc.citation.endPage299-
dc.citation.startPage288-
dc.citation.titleENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS-
dc.citation.volume56-
dc.type.docTypeArticle; Proceedings Paper-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor304H-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorStainless steel-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorWeld-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCreep-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorStress relaxation cracking-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFAILURE ANALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTUBES-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEngineering-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMaterials Science-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEngineering, Mechanical-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMaterials Science, Characterization & Testing-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > School of Mechanical Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE