독일⋅한국⋅일본의 정당방위 판례의 차이점과 그의 법문화적 배경
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김성천 | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-28T11:37:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-558X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/19265 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In judging whether one’s use of force was an act of self-defence, German law does not go through interest balancing and acknowledges all the acts that are needed to defend one’s self or others from an immediate unreasonable threat as self-defence. On the other hand, Korean and Japanese laws do go through the balancing. Accordingly, the range of the behaviors that are acknowledged as self-defence seems to be narrower in Korean and Japan than in Germany. The reason why Germany acknowledged wide range of self-defence criteria can be traced to the establishment and settlement of liberalistic law and order. The individual’s domain which is free from government interference gradually expanded. This change in law and order was also reflected on the self-defence law:The clauses that limit the range of self-defence criteria were abolished one-by-one. By abolishing the regulations that limit thebenefit and protection of the self-defence law as well as the clauses that demanded balancing, all the necessary defensive behaviors are now acknowledged as self-defence. On the other hand, Korea and Japan did not go through the establishment and settlement of liberalistic law and order. After Western society had established the liberalistic law and order, Korea and Japan obtained the resulting legal system but their societies’law and order did not fundamentally change as Western societies did. Consequently, the liberalistic law and order only exists in the textbook.This broken reality was reflected on the precedents and people have limited rights to freely defend themselves from immediate unreasonable threat. In this point of view, Korea and Japan are alike. However, Korea acknowledges relatively wider range of defensive acts as self-defence when they are conducted against offensive acts that are morally condemnable. This is believed to be due to the Korean legal culturewhere the power of social condemnation strongly and explosively aggregates at morally condemnable acts. | - |
dc.format.extent | 20 | - |
dc.publisher | 중앙법학회 | - |
dc.title | 독일⋅한국⋅일본의 정당방위 판례의 차이점과 그의 법문화적 배경 | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Difference in German, Korean, and Japanese Precedents of Self-Defence and its Legal Cultural Backgrounds | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.21759/caulaw.2013.15.4.235 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 중앙법학, v.15, no.4, pp 235 - 254 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001833364 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 254 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 235 | - |
dc.citation.title | 중앙법학 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 15 | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 정당방위 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 법문화 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 자유주의 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 이익형량 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 사회적 비난 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Notwehr | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Rechtskultur | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Liberalismus | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Güterabwägung | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | gesellschaftliche Missbilligung | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.