Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 14 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Remnant preservation is helpful to obtain good clinical results in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of clinical results of three techniques

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, S.H.-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Y.B.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, H.-J.-
dc.contributor.authorJung, H.J.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, S.H.-
dc.date.available2019-05-29T03:40:20Z-
dc.date.issued2013-11-
dc.identifier.issn2005-291X-
dc.identifier.issn2005-4408-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/19922-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical results of 3 posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques according to the time from injury to surgery and remnant PCL status and to evaluate the efficiency of each technique. Methods: The records of 89 patients who underwent primary PCL reconstructions with a posterolateral corner sling were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-four patients were treated by anterolateral bundle (ALB) reconstruction with preservation of the remnant PCL using a transtibial tunnel technique in the acute and subacute stages of injury (group 1). Forty patients were treated with remnant PCL tensioning and an ALB reconstruction using the modified inlay technique in the chronic stage (group 2), and fifteen patients were treated with double-bundle reconstruction using the modified inlay technique (group 3). The double-bundle reconstruction was performed if there was a very weak or no PCL remnant. Results: The mean side-to-side differences in posterior tibial translation on the stress radiographs were reduced from 10.1 ± 2.5 mm in group 1, 10.6 ± 2.4 mm in group 2, and 12.8 ± 3.2 mm in group 3 preoperatively to 2.3 ± 1.4 mm in group 1, 2.3 ± 1.5 mm in group 2, and 4.0 ± 2.5 mm in group 3 at the last follow-up (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Statistical analyses revealed that group 1 and group 2 were similar in terms of side-to-side difference changes in posterior tibial translation on the stress radiographs; however, group 3 was inferior to group 1 and group 2 at the last follow-up (p = 0.022). The clinical results were not significantly different among the three groups. Conclusions: Excellent posterior stability and good clinical results were achieved with ALB reconstruction preserving the injured remnant PCL in the acute and subacute stages and remnant PCL tensioning with ALB reconstruction in the chronic stage. The PCL injuries could be surgically corrected with different techniques depending on both the remnant PCL status and the interval between the knee trauma and operation. © 2013 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.-
dc.format.extent9-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisher대한정형외과학회-
dc.titleRemnant preservation is helpful to obtain good clinical results in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of clinical results of three techniques-
dc.title.alternativeRemnant Preservation is Helpful to Obtain Good Clinical Results in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Clinical Results of Three Techniques-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.278-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationClinics in Orthopedic Surgery, v.5, no.4, pp 278 - 286-
dc.identifier.kciidART001901230-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84888792472-
dc.citation.endPage286-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage278-
dc.citation.titleClinics in Orthopedic Surgery-
dc.citation.volume5-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDouble-bundle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorModified inlay-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPosterior cruciate ligament-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPosterolateral corner reconstruction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTranstibial tunnel-
dc.subject.keywordPlusadolescent-
dc.subject.keywordPlusadult-
dc.subject.keywordPlusanterolateral bundle reconstruction-
dc.subject.keywordPlusarticle-
dc.subject.keywordPluscontrolled study-
dc.subject.keywordPlusdouble bundle reconstruction-
dc.subject.keywordPlusfemale-
dc.subject.keywordPlusfollow up-
dc.subject.keywordPlushuman-
dc.subject.keywordPlusintermethod comparison-
dc.subject.keywordPlusknee injury-
dc.subject.keywordPlusknee instability-
dc.subject.keywordPlusknee surgery-
dc.subject.keywordPlusmajor clinical study-
dc.subject.keywordPlusmale-
dc.subject.keywordPlusmodified tibial inlay technique-
dc.subject.keywordPlusnuclear magnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.keywordPlusposterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-
dc.subject.keywordPlusretrospective study-
dc.subject.keywordPlusstress radiograph-
dc.subject.keywordPlussurgical technique-
dc.subject.keywordPlustranstibial tunnel technique-
dc.subject.keywordPlustreatment outcome-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDouble-bundle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusModified inlay-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPosterior cruciate ligament-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPosterolateral corner reconstruction-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTranstibial tunnel-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAdolescent-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAdult-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFemale-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHumans-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMale-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOrthopedic Procedures-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPosterior Cruciate Ligament-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRange of Motion, Articular-
dc.subject.keywordPlusReconstructive Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.keywordPlusYoung Adult-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Han Jun photo

Lee, Han Jun
의과대학 (의학부(임상-서울))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE