Detailed Information

Cited 63 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Cultural Orientation and Attitudes Toward Different Forms of Whistleblowing: A Comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the U. K.

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Heungsik-
dc.contributor.authorBlenkinsopp, John-
dc.contributor.authorOktem, M. Kemal-
dc.contributor.authorOmurgonulsen, Ugur-
dc.date.available2019-05-30T04:37:09Z-
dc.date.issued2008-11-
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544-
dc.identifier.issn1573-0697-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/23577-
dc.description.abstractThis article reports the findings of a cross-cultural study that explored the relationship between nationality, cultural orientation, and attitudes toward different ways in which an employee might blow the whistle. The study investigated two questions - are there any significant differences in the attitudes of university students from South Korea, Turkey and the U.K. toward various ways by which an employee blows the whistle in an organization?, and what effect, if any, does cultural orientation have on these attitudes? In order to answer these questions, the study identified six dimensions of whistleblowing and four types of cultural orientation. The survey was conducted among 759 university students, who voluntarily participated; 284 South Korean, 230 Turkish, and 245 U.K. Although all three samples showed a preference for formal, anonymous and internal modes of whistleblowing, there were significant variations related to nationality and cultural orientation. The findings have some key implications for organizational practice and offer directions for future research.-
dc.format.extent11-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.titleCultural Orientation and Attitudes Toward Different Forms of Whistleblowing: A Comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the U. K.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10551-007-9603-1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, v.82, no.4, pp 929 - 939-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.identifier.wosid000260066300012-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-54049131803-
dc.citation.endPage939-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage929-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS-
dc.citation.volume82-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.publisher.location네델란드-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcultural orientation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornationality-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorwhistleblowing-
dc.subject.keywordPlusUNITED-STATES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOLLECTIVISM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusETHICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINDIVIDUALISM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIMENSIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGERS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPOWER-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaBusiness & Economics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSocial Sciences - Other Topics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryBusiness-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEthics-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
College of Social Sciences > Department of Public Service > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE