간호연구 질 평가 도구 및 보고지침 고찰
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김경희 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김주현 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 임경춘 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이경숙 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 정재심 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 최명애 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 채영란 | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-26T00:55:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2383-6415 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2383-6423 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/25843 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Quality of nursing research should be evaluated before it is applied as an evidence for evidence-based nursing practice. This study attempted to analyze and to compare tools for the quality assessment and reporting standards of nursing research using CONSORT and STROBE checklist by types of research design. Methods: We searched the tools for quality assessment in nursing research based on the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) publication. Then, we analysed and compared the tools for quality evaluation by types of research design. Results: According to the analysis using CONSORT checklist, ROB shows coherence in 17 items, Jadad shows coherence in 3 items, SIGN (for RCT) shows coherence in 26 items, and Downs & Black shows coherence in 24 items. According to the analysis using STROBE checklist, MINORS shows coherence in 25 items, NOS shows coherence in 21 items, SIGN (for Cohort studies & Case-control studies) shows coherence in 29 items, and RoBANS shows coherence in 21 items. Conclusion: Based on our analysis, we recommend that nursing researchers should report according to the reporting standards of tools for quality evaluation. We hope that our analysis can be helpful to develop evidence-based nursing. | - |
dc.format.extent | 10 | - |
dc.publisher | 기초간호학회 | - |
dc.title | 간호연구 질 평가 도구 및 보고지침 고찰 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Quality Assessment Tools and Reporting Standards in Nursing Research | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7586/jkbns.2012.14.3.221 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of korean biological nursing science, v.14, no.3, pp 221 - 230 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001716687 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 230 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 221 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of korean biological nursing science | - |
dc.citation.volume | 14 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 질 평가 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 보고지침 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 간호연구 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 근거기반 실무 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Quality assessment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Reporting guideline | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nursing research | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Evidence-based nursing | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.