전기통신기본법상 허위통신죄 규정의 연혁 및 의미
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이정훈 | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-13T05:03:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-091X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/33017 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Crime of False communication on Framework Act of Telecommunications, generally known as ‘disseminaton of false information’, is criticized by many people because the clause in the act violates the principle of legality. They says if ‘false information’ itself be punished, then every expressions cannot be protected by freedom of expression. I think this opinions may be acceptable, but the clause is not aimed for dissemination of false information. From history of the clause, I conclude this clause dates from the Telecommunication Act in 1900 and the Radio Act in 1915. The old Acts were instituted by Japanese imperialism, then the clause has two categories of private interest and public interest. And the clause is necessary for protecting illegal use of telecommuncations facilities. For this reason, I think the meaning of ‘false communincation’ is not of ‘false information’ but of ‘illegal use of telecommunication’. If this clause is regarded as crime of ‘dissemination of false information’, it may be understood as repressing freedom of speech. But the crime of false communication is not interpretable as that meaning, instead as belief for safety and public concern of telecommunications include internet. Recently at the case of ‘Minerva’, the man indicted by violation of the clause of false communication on Framework Ac of Telecommunication was given a verdict of “not guilty”. This case shows the limits of application of the act. | - |
dc.format.extent | 34 | - |
dc.publisher | 한국비교형사법학회 | - |
dc.title | 전기통신기본법상 허위통신죄 규정의 연혁 및 의미 | - |
dc.title.alternative | False communication on Framework Act of Telecommunications | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.23894/kjccl.2009.11.1.009 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 비교형사법연구, v.11, no.1, pp 245 - 278 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001365215 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 278 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 245 | - |
dc.citation.title | 비교형사법연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 11 | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Framework Act of Telecommunications | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | false communication | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | dissemination of false information | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Minerva Case | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Act of Telecommunications | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 전기통신기본법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 허위통신죄 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 허위사실유포죄 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 미네르바사건 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 전기통신법 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.