章學誠의 戴東原의 道德性과 考證學 비판 연구
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이강범 | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-14T06:57:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2288-4599 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/33631 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 乾嘉時期, 考據學獨覇一時, 然至晩季國勢漸衰, 漢學弊病亦隨之浮現. 此際數家力圖總結其時其學, 或主漢學, 或主宋學, 或主折衷, 然始終未脫門戶之見. 惟章實齋一人, 以客觀治學精神, 毅然嚴厲批判其弊病, 其ꡔ通義ꡕ實爲箴砭當時經學而作. 當時通儒盡遭章氏痛駁, 其中對戴東原尤甚矣. 章氏欲別瑕而擇其瑜, 又懼‘譽者旣非其眞, 毁者亦失其眞’, 而摘戴氏‘心術不正’・‘飮水忘源’, 以及誇張訓詁・名物・典章制度之作用爲其瑕也; 而列戴氏深見古人大體, 理學文章發前人所未發者, 不泥墨守師說, 重視心得等爲其瑜也. 或曰章氏批判戴氏偏於貶, 此說未允, 實褒亦不少, 可謂知東原者實齋矣! | - |
dc.format.extent | 26 | - |
dc.publisher | 중앙대학교 외국학연구소 | - |
dc.title | 章學誠의 戴東原의 道德性과 考證學 비판 연구 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Research of Zhang-Xuecheng's Critical Arguments on Dai-Dongyuan | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15755/jfs.2009.13.2.167 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 외국학연구, v.13, no.2, pp 167 - 192 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001399966 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 192 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 167 | - |
dc.citation.title | 외국학연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 13 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 장학성(章學誠) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 대동원(戴東原) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 고증학(考證學) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 문사통의(文史通義) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 방동수(方東樹) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Zhang-Xuecheng | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Dai-Dongyuan | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Philology | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | WenshiTongyi | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Fang-Dongshu | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kciCandi | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.