LMO/GMO 규제법률 도입방법에 대한 비교법적 고찰 - 한국, 미국, 유럽연합을 중심으로 -Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Approaches to LMO/GMO - Focusing on Korea, U.S. and EU -
- Authors
- 박원석
- Issue Date
- 2010
- Publisher
- 중앙법학회
- Keywords
- GMO/LMO; Transgenic Organisms; Convention on Biological Diversity; CBD; Protocol on Biosafety; Advanced Informed Agreement; AIA; 유전자변형생물체; 형질전환생물체; 생물다양성협약; 바이오안전성의정서; 사전통보합의
- Citation
- 중앙법학, v.12, no.1, pp 261 - 291
- Pages
- 31
- Journal Title
- 중앙법학
- Volume
- 12
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 261
- End Page
- 291
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/33775
- DOI
- 10.21759/caulaw.2010.12.1.261
- ISSN
- 1598-558X
- Abstract
- Korea, U.S.A., and EU show different introduction of LMO/GMOs regulations. While Korea and EU, as a Party to Biological Safety Protocol, have adopted similar approaches to regulate LMO/GMOs products, U.S.A. has chose its unique or non-specific general LMO/GMOs regulations.
EU legislations on LMO/GMOs has been in place since the early 1990s, and they include Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (OJ No L268/1, 18.10.2003), Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC (OJ No L.268/24,18.10.2003), Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, Directive 2009/41/EC on the contained use of generically modified micro-organisms, Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 on transboundary movement of LMO/GMO.
On the other hand, U.S.C. does not have no single statue and no single federal agency to govern the regulation of biotechnology products. As a result, a complex range of laws govern to all foods, drugs and chemicals produced from biotechnology. Under these laws, three federal agencies-the FDA, Department of Agriculture, and the Environmental Protection Agency have primary responsibility for the regulation of biotechnology products.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Law School > Law > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/33775)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.