Peer-Led Written Debriefing Versus Instructor-Led Oral Debriefing: Using Multimode Simulation
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ha, E.-H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, E.J. | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-08T06:57:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-05 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1876-1399 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1876-1402 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/3384 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Instructor-led oral debriefing (ILOD) conveys accurate knowledge but requires highly trained experts. This study evaluated nursing students’ knowledge and confidence of preoperative nursing skills and their satisfaction with debriefing and simulation using peer-led written debriefing (PLWD) and instructor-led debriefing. Method: To compare and analyze effects of PLWD and ILOD using multimode simulation, participants were randomly divided into two groups: PLWD (n = 60) and ILOD (n = 62). Results: No significant differences in the total knowledge score, satisfaction with multimode simulation, or satisfaction on debriefing between PLWD and ILOD were found. Conclusions: PLWD may be as effective as an ILOD and could improve resource utilization and feasibility. However, the method of PLWD for this study is useful for basic skill scenarios, in particular, and may not be applicable in all scenarios. © 2018 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning | - |
dc.format.extent | 9 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. | - |
dc.title | Peer-Led Written Debriefing Versus Instructor-Led Oral Debriefing: Using Multimode Simulation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.02.002 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Clinical Simulation in Nursing, v.18, pp 38 - 46 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000432650200006 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85043756461 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 46 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 38 | - |
dc.citation.title | Clinical Simulation in Nursing | - |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | debriefing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | knowledge | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | nursing students | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | patient simulation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | personal satisfaction | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HIGH-FIDELITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PERFORMANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | VIDEO | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Nursing | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Nursing | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.